Earth's Outer Core, Rotation, Surface Air Temperature May Explain Climate Change

jerry-lewisBy Tiffany Kaiser

NASA and international university researchers claim that humans have thrown off the balance between the Earth’s rotation, surface air temperatures and movements in its molten core through our contribution of greenhouse gases.

Those included in the study were Jean Dickey and Steven Marcus from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, along with Olivier de Viron, from the Universite Paris Diderot and Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris in France.

Read the rest at Daily Tech

22 Responses to Earth's Outer Core, Rotation, Surface Air Temperature May Explain Climate Change

  1. NEIL F. AGWD/BSD March 15, 2011 at 7:25 pm #

    I stopped reading as soon as they said computer models. Geeesh. Imagine that. Coming up with a computer model to prove exactly what you wanted it to prove! Amazing!
    I never thought a scientist could be a knucklehead, but these people really are…. because they think that is what we are. The picture selected by dan in the header is quite appropriate I’d say. These scientists are knuckleheads for thinking wer’e going to fall for the old computer model study ploy.

    • Rob N. Hood May 24, 2011 at 3:33 pm #

      Damn evil Liberal scientists!

  2. paul wenum March 15, 2011 at 9:02 pm #

    I guess all fat people should move to the left and skinny people move to the right? I cannot believe what I just read. Nothing ever ceases to amaze me when it comes to natural climate change by a select group of “Learned” individuals with their “computer models.” What a waste of our tax paying dollars. My children could have written this piece when in grade school. Is that what it has come to? Cut off their grants! God be with us.

    • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD March 16, 2011 at 5:47 am #

      I love it! So which side are you going? Left or right? I’m afraid I’d start going to the right, and they will stop me and say “no, no, no, you go that way”!

  3. Hal Groar March 15, 2011 at 9:05 pm #

    I see where this study is going…AGW caused the earthquake in Japan and will destroy California within 7 months if we all don’t buy CFL’s and a Volt. You heard it here first! Now CO2 is responsible for earthquakes. Your right Neil, the “computer model” is a dead giveaway. In other words, we can’t prove it with facts so we create facts that support our agenda! Why is NASA’s JPL in on this anyway?

    • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD March 16, 2011 at 5:54 am #

      hal, I think you are exactly right. They are really trying hard to tie anything, and everything to AGW. Next they’ll try to link meteor showers, and solar output to AGW with a computer model.

      • Jerk A. Knot March 16, 2011 at 11:58 am #

        I can not believe they did not look at sun activity. I don’t know what caused the annomolies but I would sure be looking at the sun before I looked at “man.”

        OBTW…. on M,W,F you ca only drive east. T,T,S you can only drive east. on Sunday people with odd # adress drive north and thoes with even # adresses drive south.

        Goodness gracious…..

        • Hal Groar March 16, 2011 at 12:14 pm #

          This has the vagaries of a snow emergency…call it “Earth Emergency!” If you have three people in your car and have an odd address and it’s Thursday after dusk you can only go southwest until midnight then your free to turn around and go the other direction. What a country!

          • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD March 16, 2011 at 7:08 pm #

            Why, that makes purpheked sense!

        • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD March 17, 2011 at 7:58 pm #

          “I can not believe they did not look at sun activity.”

          I can totally believe it JAK! There are probably many things they did not look at. If they did look at old Sol, they would not have gotten the result that they intended the study to produce! And that is my point, has been my point, about computer models from day 1. You can produce any result you want to produce. If I knew how to do computer modeling I bet I could come up with a thousand different simulations that would “prove” that AGW is false and that CO2 has no effect whatsoever on anything! Anytime you hear “computer modeling”, “model”, “projection”, or any similar pseudonym, move on to the next story because that one is worthless.
          I should say though that I’m talking about climate models. There are some computer models out there about financial stuff, and other things like that, that are probably fairly accurate because all of the parameters are known. My problem with climate models is that there are too many unknown factors to even begin to outline the parameters.

  4. Rob N. Hood May 27, 2011 at 2:58 pm #

    Neil says: “My problem with climate models is that there are too many unknown factors to even begin to outline the parameters.” Wow… we’d all still be living in caves if humans used this factor as an excuse for anything difficult. However, AGW wouldn’t be a factor if we still lived in caves…maybe Neil is a genius after all!!!

  5. paul wenum May 27, 2011 at 10:54 pm #

    Neil seems to research more than you or I and has the foresight to post that which is relevant. More so than you or I. Kudos to Neil!!! Keep it up Neil!

  6. Rob N. Hood June 2, 2011 at 4:37 pm #

    Paul, your response has nothing to do with my criticism, as usual. We all know you love Neil, and vice versa.

  7. paul wenum June 3, 2011 at 9:11 pm #

    Typical response, always degrading. I simply agree with Neil. Is that a problem? Apparently it is with you.

  8. Rob N. Hood June 6, 2011 at 7:22 am #


  9. paul wenum June 7, 2011 at 7:51 pm #

    Typical left wing liberal response. Assume that I’m racist as well? Good Bye.

  10. paul wenum June 7, 2011 at 11:27 pm #

    Pa-Ka, Robbie Boy. Have better things in life to do then play head games with you. See you, Soros and your ilk in 2012 won’t we. Take a deep breath, we are coming. Can hardly wait. I was right last time and believe I’m right this time. Dasvidania!

  11. Rob N. Hood June 8, 2011 at 5:39 am #

    Yes Paul, you are amazing and omnicient and a genius… it took over a whole year for me to finally see that, and force me to throw in the towel. Seriously though, your side wins most of the time and you should be optimistic. Your ilk gets it’s way,more ofetn than not, and has gotten it’s way since St. Reagan declared war on the middle class. You really should be happier, but your ilk never will be. It’s never enough for you. You want fascist dictatorship, or so you think. If and when that finally fully occurs here in the US (we are pretty close, especially thanks to W) you still won’t be happy. Why? Because life here will be hell, what you think you want would be hell. But you and your ilk will fight for it till the day you die.

  12. paul wenum June 8, 2011 at 7:54 pm #

    With Soros as your leader in chief I say bring it on.

  13. Rob N. Hood June 9, 2011 at 5:47 am #

    I thought Al Gore was my leader according to you guys…?! Please make up your mind.

  14. paul wenum June 10, 2011 at 8:55 pm #

    As stated, they are all one of a kind. A Chameleon always changes with a little change in the weather. Gore, Soros et al. Whatever pays their bills and keeps their private jets flying to their mansions far and wide while they dictate how far you can drive, what vehicle you use, “carbon” you expel as they sit back waiting for the Cap N Trade to make them billions. Suggest that you do not exhale any longer, if so your taxes will be astronomical. Of course, you do it for “The Cause,” for which has never to this day been decided by either party other than the discredited IPCCA.

  15. Charlotte February 15, 2012 at 3:57 pm #

    The only knuckleheads are the ones who buy into the whole idiotic notion that science is manufactured and that climate change is not happening. It is. It’s real. That having been said, the idea that it has any relationship to earthquakes is ludicrous. Where it DOES have a connection is that because of the warming, the sea levels are rising. Therefore when there is an event like a tsunamigenic earthquake (which have always happened throughout history and which will continue to happen at about the same rate), more inhabited lands are at risk because there’s more water to slosh over them and more people living near the shore (due to idiotic anti-contraception policies leading to overpopulation) so there are more people in harm’s way. But no, global warming is not related to the earthquakes themselves.

A project of Minnesota Majority, hosted and maintained by Minnesotans for Global Warming.