Comments for Global Climate Scam http://www.globalclimatescam.com Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:13:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 Comment on Georgia Ethanol Plant Sold, at Taxpayers’ Loss by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/georgia-ethanol-plant-sold-at-taxpayers-loss/comment-page-1/#comment-46276 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:13:15 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2062#comment-46276 I only worship one called, "God, My Savior." I only worship one called, “God, My Savior.”

]]> Comment on The 11 Other Solyndras by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/the-11-other-solyndras/comment-page-1/#comment-46274 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:10:55 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2064#comment-46274 No detail nor specifics. Dreams with no substance. Deal in reality. You will then wake up from your dream world. Reality is a wonderful thing if you know how to handle/deal with it. No detail nor specifics. Dreams with no substance. Deal in reality. You will then wake up from your dream world. Reality is a wonderful thing if you know how to handle/deal with it.

]]> Comment on Carbon Dioxide Encourages Risky Behaviour in Clownfish by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/carbon-dioxide-encourages-risky-behaviour-in-clownfish/comment-page-1/#comment-46272 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:07:32 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2067#comment-46272 Clownfish are "good eatin" with a little CO2. Clownfish are “good eatin” with a little CO2.

]]> Comment on Climate Change Skepticism Seeps into Science Classrooms by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/climate-change-skepticism-seeps-into-science-classrooms/comment-page-1/#comment-46271 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:06:13 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2073#comment-46271 Hood, love to read your inane comments. You make me love sanity more than you will ever know. By the way, wish to thank Dan for his efforts on Voter ID! Kudo's. Keep it up! Hood, love to read your inane comments. You make me love sanity more than you will ever know. By the way, wish to thank Dan for his efforts on Voter ID! Kudo’s. Keep it up!

]]> Comment on Bankrupt Solyndra Caught Destroying Brand New Parts by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/bankrupt-solyndra-caught-destroying-brand-new-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-46269 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:01:18 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2077#comment-46269 Apparently you have never read history. I went through those early days in finance and I believe I know a little more than you about what I stated. Apparently I suspect it fell upon deaf left wing liberal ears. The Left Wing Liberal will never change. Give them a factual statement and they call you a racist, change the subject, never answer and then scream and holler thereafter. Like a child that cannot get their way. You did all of the above except racist. Is that next? Apparently you have never read history. I went through those early days in finance and I believe I know a little more than you about what I stated. Apparently I suspect it fell upon deaf left wing liberal ears. The Left Wing Liberal will never change. Give them a factual statement and they call you a racist, change the subject, never answer and then scream and holler thereafter. Like a child that cannot get their way. You did all of the above except racist. Is that next?

]]> Comment on Inhofe Comments on State of the Union Address by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/inhofe-comments-on-state-of-the-union-address/comment-page-1/#comment-46268 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:54:25 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2080#comment-46268 Apparently you have never ever dealt with the real world nor guys like me up front and personal. I assume you play computer games and never see sunlight? Sounds like it. What is that they call it they wear? Ah yes, A hoodie? Can visualize you now, pale white face with lap top in hand with a hoodie covering your identity such as your fake name with your blasts about the past and then try to predict the alleged failing future of doom using posts from others called plagarism. Will never change will it... Arrrgh! Apparently you have never ever dealt with the real world nor guys like me up front and personal. I assume you play computer games and never see sunlight? Sounds like it. What is that they call it they wear? Ah yes, A hoodie? Can visualize you now, pale white face with lap top in hand with a hoodie covering your identity such as your fake name with your blasts about the past and then try to predict the alleged failing future of doom using posts from others called plagarism. Will never change will it… Arrrgh!

]]> Comment on Sixteen Concerned Scientists: No Need to Panic About Global Warming by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/sixteen-concerned-scientists-no-need-to-panic-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-46266 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:40:07 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2084#comment-46266 I'm sure you would. The USA is getting that way since "Our Leader." I’m sure you would. The USA is getting that way since “Our Leader.”

]]> Comment on Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again) by Joe http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/forget-global-warming-its-cycle-25-we-need-to-worry-about-and-if-nasa-scientists-are-right-the-thames-will-be-freezing-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-46264 Joe Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:36:48 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2090#comment-46264 Neil, like your posts! I read the same article above. Hood is good at getting under your skin isn't he? He brings out the worse of us and I'm guilty as charged. Must put my shield back up and sword drawn? Have in the past, but have not unloaded lately. As to RNH, question to him is "What do you define as "honesty"? (This will be a barnburner, Neil and interesting response from this Hood fellow). Keep it up Neil we are both alleged denier's of a natural occurance called climate change a/k/a Global warming. Correct me if I'm wrong. Finally, I'm not in the science community but friends of mine are, one from NASA, name not to be published, and they all say it is B.S. and yes, Hood, they have PHD's and know what they are discussiing. Not a neophyte like you with posts and blasts with political quotes and agendas that follow thereafter. Await your normal caustic difference of opinion that I assume will be forthcoming shortly? Waiting. Neil, like your posts! I read the same article above. Hood is good at getting under your skin isn’t he? He brings out the worse of us and I’m guilty as charged. Must put my shield back up and sword drawn? Have in the past, but have not unloaded lately. As to RNH, question to him is “What do you define as “honesty”? (This will be a barnburner, Neil and interesting response from this Hood fellow). Keep it up Neil we are both alleged denier’s of a natural occurance called climate change a/k/a Global warming. Correct me if I’m wrong. Finally, I’m not in the science community but friends of mine are, one from NASA, name not to be published, and they all say it is B.S. and yes, Hood, they have PHD’s and know what they are discussiing. Not a neophyte like you with posts and blasts with political quotes and agendas that follow thereafter. Await your normal caustic difference of opinion that I assume will be forthcoming shortly? Waiting.

]]> Comment on Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again) by NEIL F. AGWD/BSD http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/forget-global-warming-its-cycle-25-we-need-to-worry-about-and-if-nasa-scientists-are-right-the-thames-will-be-freezing-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-46253 NEIL F. AGWD/BSD Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:16:23 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2090#comment-46253 Take for instance the story above. It claims that for the last 15 years there has been no warming. And everyone goes nuts about it. 'Here is graph of HADCRUT3 data for the last 15 years. http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1997/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1997/trend The trend is a tiny bit of warming about 0.02 degrees C. Certainly not as much as the computer models predicted, this is a slight warming trend.... from 15 years ago. Now is this a significant warming trend? I would say no. Because the uncertainty, or error range is probably a little more than 0.02 degrees C. So my opinion is that given the context of what models were predicting, and the uncertainty/error allowance, this writer has every right to say that there has been no warming for the last 15 years. Because there really has not. Ok technically a smidge, but it's nothing in the signal to noise ratio, and it is nothing compared to what was projected by computer models 15 years ago. But we get the rebuttle from Renewable Guy with a story, with a letter, in it from HADLEY saying Mr. Rose didn't use all the information we gave him, and we explained that our models are robust, and we're always updating them and blah, 30 years, and blah, blah. And none of it changes anything. So what if he didn't use everything they told him? What journalist uses everything? Besides, he used a lot of it he just happened to not agree with it. And it was an opinion piece. And I agree with him. So why is there such an uproar from HADLEY? Take for instance the story above. It claims that for the last 15 years there has been no warming. And everyone goes nuts about it. ‘Here is graph of HADCRUT3 data for the last 15 years.

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1997/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:1997/trend

The trend is a tiny bit of warming about 0.02 degrees C. Certainly not as much as the computer models predicted, this is a slight warming trend…. from 15 years ago. Now is this a significant warming trend? I would say no. Because the uncertainty, or error range is probably a little more than 0.02 degrees C. So my opinion is that given the context of what models were predicting, and the uncertainty/error allowance, this writer has every right to say that there has been no warming for the last 15 years. Because there really has not. Ok technically a smidge, but it’s nothing in the signal to noise ratio, and it is nothing compared to what was projected by computer models 15 years ago.
But we get the rebuttle from Renewable Guy with a story, with a letter, in it from HADLEY saying Mr. Rose didn’t use all the information we gave him, and we explained that our models are robust, and we’re always updating them and blah, 30 years, and blah, blah. And none of it changes anything. So what if he didn’t use everything they told him? What journalist uses everything? Besides, he used a lot of it he just happened to not agree with it. And it was an opinion piece. And I agree with him.
So why is there such an uproar from HADLEY?

]]> Comment on Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again) by NEIL F. AGWD/BSD http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/forget-global-warming-its-cycle-25-we-need-to-worry-about-and-if-nasa-scientists-are-right-the-thames-will-be-freezing-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-46247 NEIL F. AGWD/BSD Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:36:27 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2090#comment-46247 It is specifically why I come here. I can't argue about this stuff at work because I am usually with a customer, and I'm not going to get into arguments of any kind with a customer. That's an easy way to become unemployed. I don't argue about this stuff with my family either because my family is effed up and fractured enough already. I know this could cause a major problem with at least two of my sisters because they are very, very Liberal, and are very much believers of AGW. I don't care if I sound arrogant, maybe I am a little, but I am here to argue what I believe. Not to be social, not to compromise, not to placate the opposition, and not to make friends. If you got something to refute what I say I welcome it. But we get the drive-by's like Renewable Guy, and that Bill guy on a previous post who just post all this crap about 97% percent of scientists say..., or This study says,... or these scientists say, and all of it can be logically shot full of holes. They post it like it is the last word on the subject, and they don't question it. I do. And that's what I do here, I question the orthodoxy of the AGW religion. And I get pounded for it, I know I'm going to get pounded for it, but I have fun doing it. I meant what I said about competition. It really does spur me to dig deeper into things. So, I don't expect everyone to go along with me, I don't want everyone to go along with me. What would be the fun of that? It is specifically why I come here. I can’t argue about this stuff at work because I am usually with a customer, and I’m not going to get into arguments of any kind with a customer. That’s an easy way to become unemployed. I don’t argue about this stuff with my family either because my family is effed up and fractured enough already. I know this could cause a major problem with at least two of my sisters because they are very, very Liberal, and are very much believers of AGW.
I don’t care if I sound arrogant, maybe I am a little, but I am here to argue what I believe. Not to be social, not to compromise, not to placate the opposition, and not to make friends.
If you got something to refute what I say I welcome it. But we get the drive-by’s like Renewable Guy, and that Bill guy on a previous post who just post all this crap about 97% percent of scientists say…, or This study says,… or these scientists say, and all of it can be logically shot full of holes. They post it like it is the last word on the subject, and they don’t question it. I do. And that’s what I do here, I question the orthodoxy of the AGW religion. And I get pounded for it, I know I’m going to get pounded for it, but I have fun doing it. I meant what I said about competition. It really does spur me to dig deeper into things.
So, I don’t expect everyone to go along with me, I don’t want everyone to go along with me. What would be the fun of that?

]]> Comment on Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about (and if NASA scientists are right the Thames will be freezing over again) by NEIL F. AGWD/BSD http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/forget-global-warming-its-cycle-25-we-need-to-worry-about-and-if-nasa-scientists-are-right-the-thames-will-be-freezing-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-46246 NEIL F. AGWD/BSD Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:13:31 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2090#comment-46246 I never said that you definately had an angle, or trick up your sleeve, I said I can't help but think you do. If you do I don't know what it is, if you don't then I'm wrong. It's a chance I'm willing to take. I never said that you definately had an angle, or trick up your sleeve, I said I can’t help but think you do. If you do I don’t know what it is, if you don’t then I’m wrong. It’s a chance I’m willing to take.

]]> Comment on Climate Change Skepticism Seeps into Science Classrooms by Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/climate-change-skepticism-seeps-into-science-classrooms/comment-page-1/#comment-46241 Rob N. Hood Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:34:40 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2073#comment-46241 And Neil had those two concepts preeettty tied up into a nice little bow... And Neil had those two concepts preeettty tied up into a nice little bow…

]]> Comment on Climate Change Skepticism Seeps into Science Classrooms by Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/climate-change-skepticism-seeps-into-science-classrooms/comment-page-1/#comment-46240 Rob N. Hood Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:33:43 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2073#comment-46240 And I asked Neil- not you. But you're entitled I guess... And I asked Neil- not you. But you’re entitled I guess…

]]> Comment on Climate Change Skepticism Seeps into Science Classrooms by Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/climate-change-skepticism-seeps-into-science-classrooms/comment-page-1/#comment-46239 Rob N. Hood Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:32:28 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2073#comment-46239 Ahhh, well that's clear as mud. Thanks Dan! I do believe many of the "pushers" beleive in what they are doing. Just as you believe in what it is you do. As for the PRM (Population Reduction Movement...guess we can acrocynmize that, eh??!!) that would be such a samll tightly knit group of ELITE (if they in fact do exist) that you or I will probably never know of them either way. I don't want to say you people are paranoid, but..... well, what the heck, you are. So in other words Dan- you neatly sliced those two Intertwined beliefs, as if with a Ginsu knife... pretty slick there Slick. Ahhh, well that’s clear as mud. Thanks Dan! I do believe many of the “pushers” beleive in what they are doing. Just as you believe in what it is you do. As for the PRM (Population Reduction Movement…guess we can acrocynmize that, eh??!!) that would be such a samll tightly knit group of ELITE (if they in fact do exist) that you or I will probably never know of them either way. I don’t want to say you people are paranoid, but….. well, what the heck, you are. So in other words Dan- you neatly sliced those two Intertwined beliefs, as if with a Ginsu knife… pretty slick there Slick.

]]> Comment on Bankrupt Solyndra Caught Destroying Brand New Parts by Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/01/bankrupt-solyndra-caught-destroying-brand-new-parts/comment-page-1/#comment-46238 Rob N. Hood Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:25:36 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2077#comment-46238 Yessiree, that ol' Jimmy, that good ol' boy, put a commie "stink bomb" into place that he knew would pay off big time for the Kremlin decades later!! Smart! Yessiree, that ol’ Jimmy, that good ol’ boy, put a commie “stink bomb” into place that he knew would pay off big time for the Kremlin decades later!! Smart!

]]>