Strange Allies in the War on Carbon Fuels

by Viv Forbes

What great cause could unite Prince Charles, President Obama, the Pope, the Arab Oil sheiks, the United Nations, the European Union, the Russians, the Chinese, Pacific Island Nations, most undeveloped countries, the glitterati of Hollywood, left-wing politicians, unrepentant reds, government media, the climate research industry, Big Oil, Big Gas and the Green Blob. It must be something posing a clear and urgent danger to all humanity?

No, the crusade that unites them all is the War on Carbon Fuels, focussed mainly on that most vilified target, coal.

The biggest group, and the generals in this war on carbon, have no real interest in the facts or science of global climate change – they see climate alarmism as a great opportunity to achieve their goal of creating an unelected global government. They have even laid out their plans in a document called Agenda 21.

This group naturally includes the United Nations and all of its subsidiaries, the EU, and left wing politicians and media everywhere. At a news conference in Brussels recently, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity, but “to change the economic development model” ie destroy what is left of free enterprise and private property. See:

The next big group of carbon warriors is the anti-western failed states who see this as their big chance to enrich and entrench their ruling classes with “climate reparations”.

Then there are the enviro-entrepreneurs forever seeking new crusades to energise their supporters and get the donations rolling in – Greenpeace, WWF, Get Up etc…

In the dark corner are the anti-human Malthusians and the Deep Greens who want to get rid of most of us other people – personified by the rich and powerful such as Prince Charles and Maurice Strong. They know that carbon fuels support millions of people by cultivating, harvesting, transporting, processing and storing most of the food that supports the cities of the world. Killing the use of carbon fuels will certainly achieve their goal of reduced world population. See:

Naturally, government media usually support a bigger role for government, and all media like a scare story. Truth or logic does not matter greatly for most of them – just so long as they can coax a looming disaster story from someone. The daily diet of natural calamities soon heightens climate anxiety, which then motivates politicians to be seen to be “doing something”.

And then there are those who see that fighting carbon fuels also suits their pockets. As someone said “When placing a bet, the best horse to back is the one called ‘Self-interest’ – at least you know he is trying”.

For example, Shell, with its massive gas interests, was caught campaigning against coal fired power, the main competitor of gas in electricity generation. See:

Arab Oil interests were caught funding a film attacking their competitors – shale oil fracking in America. See:

And a Russian oil company was exposed funding US anti-carbon green groups. See:

The Chinese of course are great supporters of green energy as long as it is installed elsewhere – eg they supply the machines and solar panels and then welcome the factories forced from the host country by soaring electricity prices.

Gas, nuclear and hydro power will be the greatest long term beneficiaries of the war on coal. Initially they will be needed to provide base load and back up for intermittent green power like wind and solar. Then as green subsidies are withdrawn to appease angry tax payers, the green play-toys will fail and grown-up generators will step easily into full time electricity production.

Finally, the government bureaucracy and the research grants industry justify their existence by “solving community crises”. They love “The Climate Crisis” because it can be blamed for any weather event anytime, anywhere. It is unlikely to be solved, no matter how many dollars are thrown at it – a problem that does not exist can never be “solved”. And the sinister “Greenhouse Effect”, like any good ghost, is invisible, mysterious in operation, debatable, and allows anyone to produce their own scare story.

Opposing this coalition of climate alarmists and opportunists is a rag-tag army of stressed tax payers and electricity consumers and a scattering of sceptical scientists and media researchers.

But the imposing alarmist empire has a hollow heart – the globe has refused to warm, the alarmist “science” is crumbling, their climate models are discredited, some researchers have been caught manipulating records and results, and the costs of green electricity are becoming obvious and onerous. The public is growing restive, governments can no longer afford the climate industry cuckoo in the public nest and the ranks of sceptics grow. Groups like UKIP in UK and the Tea Party in US have abandoned the war on carbon.

The climate revolt is spreading.

Viv Forbes,
Rosewood Qld Australia

Disclosure: Viv Forbes is a shareholder and non-executive director of a small Australian coal exploration company. His views are not shared or supported by most Big Coal CEO’s.

12 Responses to Strange Allies in the War on Carbon Fuels

  1. Dan Pangburn February 19, 2015 at 5:13 pm #

    The simple proof that CO2 change does not cause climate change has been hiding in plain sight and here it is:

    CO2 has been considered to be a forcing with units Joules/sec. Energy change, which is revealed by temperature change, has units Joules. Average forcing times duration produces energy change. Equivalently, a scale factor times the time-integral of the CO2 level produces the temperature change.

    During previous glaciations and interglacials (as so dramatically displayed in An Inconvenient Truth) CO2 and temperature went up and down nearly together. This is impossible if CO2 is a significant forcing (scale factor not zero) so this actually proves CO2 CHANGE DOES NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT AVERAGE GLOBAL TEMPERATURE CHANGE.

    Application of this analysis methodology to CO2 levels for the entire Phanerozoic eon (about 542 million years) (Berner, 2001) proves that CO2 levels up to at least 6 times the present will have no significant effect on average global temperature.

    See more on this and discover the two factors that do cause climate change (95% correlation since before 1900) at Energy and Environment, vol. 25, No. 8, 1455-1471 or search “agwunveiled”.

    • Peter_PNW March 8, 2015 at 6:36 pm #

      Dan, I really don’t understand your reasoning.

      Could you model it with some simple arithmetic?

  2. The Illuminati February 25, 2015 at 11:08 pm #

    You know, you guys are stupid. Global warming is real, obviously. The globe is warming, and humans are playing a significant factor. Experts have agreed on that

    • The Truth Seeker March 3, 2015 at 10:25 pm #

      The warming has stopped and co2 levels are still increasing. Greenhouse effect proved wrong.

      • The Truth Seeker March 3, 2015 at 10:27 pm #

        These so called experts have been fiddling with data and conspiriting with each other to make cLImatE change look real. And don’t believe Al Gore when he says the science is settled. Until he admits he was wrong it won’t be.

      • Peter_PNW March 8, 2015 at 3:54 pm #

        Fiddle with this “data”

    • georgekaplan March 8, 2015 at 3:38 pm #

      Is that all you have to say in response to Dan’s comment? Sounds like he knows what he is speaking of, whereas, you don’t.

  3. jooface March 10, 2015 at 3:33 am #

    i live by the beach, and have lived here by this same beach four years ago. the water is higher, there is slightly less beach, and the water in high tide sometimes will go into beachfront yards now. whatever is causing it, the water is getting higher. dont buy beach front.

  4. Adam March 11, 2015 at 1:50 am #

    You guys are stupid. Cite your sources that claim wanting has stopped. Cute your sources that support your statement that c02 keeps rising but the planets not getting warmer. Not conspiracy theories, actual scientific evidence. Go!

  5. Adam March 11, 2015 at 1:55 am #


  6. Drewski March 12, 2015 at 6:20 am #

    “The biggest group, and the generals in this war on carbon, have no real interest in the facts or science of global climate change – they see climate alarmism as a great opportunity to achieve their goal of creating an unelected global government. They have even laid out their plans in a document called Agenda 21.”

    [personal attack deleted by moderator – review posting rules.]

  7. Michael Mcardle November 4, 2015 at 9:27 am #

    Biggest threat is GMO’s as they are turning organic fields in to havens for all the bugs to attack. As GMO plants are designed to fend off bugs it kill the infrastructure of the planet. without bugs and bee’s we are done. Humans are the worst virus this planet has ever seen.

A project of Minnesota Majority, hosted and maintained by Minnesotans for Global Warming.