Millie Weaver interviews Holly Swanson about the undisclosed agenda of the newly implemented environmental movement within our schools. They discuss how the environmental movement is used to politicize curriculum under the pretense of environmental education to advance green party goals and communism on America’s children.
Please support this channel by embedding the link!
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show
Follow Millie on TWITTER – https://twitter.com/millie__weaver
Like Alex on FACEBOOK – https://www.facebook.com/millieweaver
Interesting. The first contrary ‘global warming’ blog I’ve come upon that actually uses the word ‘communism’! A little correction, though, Marxists call themselves ‘vanguard communists’, waiting for the arrival of communism from the debris of ‘advanced’ capitalism; so no communism yet, according to Marxists. But that’s okay, you have correctly identified the enemy that push the ‘climate change’ scam.
While there certainly is warming going on, the question is the cause for the warming, and the cause isn’t Carbon Dioxide, which is a COOLING molecule in Earth’s atmosphere. The reason Marxists point a finger at Carbon Dioxide is to drastically reduce Carbon Dioxide emissions into the atmosphere would further sink the economies of the West, assisting in elevating the strategic objectives of the USSR and the People’s Republic of China, both nations being allies…always were allies.
Back to Carbon Dioxide and how the atmosphere heats…
The following is the second half of my article, ‘Throwing Cold Water on Global Warming’…
– More important than a gas’ IR absorption capabilities is an atmosphere gas
molecule’s volume. One pound of Carbon Dioxide has a volume of 8.7 cubic
feet, smaller than Nitrogen at 13.8 cubic feet, and Oxygen at 12.1
cubic feet. With a smaller volume than either Nitrogen and Oxygen,
Carbon Dioxide can only possess less heat than Nitrogen and Oxygen.
Because the atmosphere is a Nitrogen-Oxygen based atmosphere, representing over 99.9% of the atmosphere’s gasses, adding Carbon Dioxide to the
atmosphere cools the Nitrogen-Oxygen based atmosphere, as
demonstrated in experimental designs conducted by Professor Gert Venter,
Agricultural Engineering, University of Pretoria: “You
know, that’s why all I can do is laugh when these global warming
monkeys tell me that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. It is not, and I have
live, precise experimental situations in over 30 sites around the world
that prove that it is not. These guys create a model in their computers,
based on arbitrary assumptions, and then ignore all the experimental
evidence to the contrary. My experiments show that INCREASING
ATMOSPHERIC CO2 IS CORRELLATED WITH A DECREASE IN ATMOSPHERIC
TEMPERATURE in my agricultural environments.”
With Carbon Dioxide A Cooling Molecule In Earth’s Atmosphere, Then What Is Warming The Atmosphere?
The heat obtained by both Nitrogen and Oxygen comes from thermals and latent heat from the surface, heat from man-made structures on the ground, and the
heat produced by incoming radiation absorbed directly by the atmosphere,
not solely from the absorption of outgoing IR. The warmth that blankets
us each day is due to Nitrogen and Oxygen, not the puny amounts of the
trace gas Carbon Dioxide, nor any of the other trace gasses.
Regarding man-made structures on the ground, interestingly NASA’s ‘earth’s energy budget’ illustration fails to provide the data on the amount of solar
radiation absorbed by those structures, and it is the massive growth of
urban sprawl the last sixty years that accounts for the atmosphere’s
warming, a warming that is being tempered by increasing amounts of
Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. –
To read first half of article, see link below…
Global Climate Scam is a ‘false opposition’ scam, spiking my two comments on the ‘climate change’ fraud!
False opposition? How does that work? Are you saying that they really are proponents of anthropogenic global warming, but are just pretending to be in opposition to it? That literally makes no sense. Do you understand the meanings of words?
Global warming is caused by the massive increase the last sixty years in man-made structures on the ground that absorbs solar radiation then releases thermal heat that Nitrogen and Oxygen pick up. Global warming isn’t caused by Carbon Dioxide, a well known COOLING molecule in Earth’s atmosphere.
The volume of a gas molecule determines the amount of heat it can maintain, and Carbon Dioxide’s volume is less than that of Nitrogen and Oxygen, the two molecules that surround us and warm the planet, the two molecules that ‘climate change’ frauds refuse to talk about.
More important than a gas’ IR absorption capabilities is an atmosphere gas molecule’s volume. One pound of Carbon Dioxide has a volume of 8.7 cubic feet, smaller than Nitrogen at 13.8 cubic feet, and Oxygen at 12.1 cubic feet. With a smaller volume than either Nitrogen and Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide can only possess less heat than Nitrogen and Oxygen.
My blog’s website is in my Disqus page, just click my name. See the article, ‘Throwing Cold Water on Global Warming’.
Even if this were true, and I’m not saying it is or isn’t, why would that make Global Climate Scam a ‘false opposition’ scam?
Good question, and due to my brief reply which didn’t delve more deeply into the subject.
The [Marxist] false opposition position on global warming is its refusal to alert readers to the fake science regarding Carbon Dioxide’s COOLING effect in Earth’s atmosphere, due to its smaller volume compared to Nitrogen and Oxygen. The debate between the ‘opposition’ and ‘false opposition’ is one of degree, not kind. The ‘false opposition’ says global warming has stalled the last two decades (or the rate of increase has leveled out), or that future increases in temperature due to Carbon Dioxide are exaggerated. Well, stalled temperatures can reignite, and the public has no idea who’s exaggerating, so the public naturally sides with the ‘opposition’.
The purpose for the ‘climate change’ hoax* is to further weaken the West’s economies. Currently we’re experiencing economic sabotage via central bank low interest rates that sever the connection between the price of LOANED capital and its employment for those business ventures that require loans for large capital outlays, but because central bank interest rates (price of capital) are so low, there’s no funding for such business ventures that must have larger interest payments that represent the much larger capital outlay…
Price Controls on Capital
When a central bank places ruinous price controls on interest rates it effectively negates any new business ventures that require huge initial outlays of loaned capital for startup. Economic growth can only occur by an increase in savings (less consumption) for future greater consumption brought about by those savings. The savings that go into production, and not used for consumption, decrease the general price level via cheaper commodities and lower costs of business. Increasing consumption does nothing to enhance productivity since no new commodities/technologies are created by consumption. Consumption is merely consuming what already exists.
We are witnesses to an economic doctrine, only recently devised by Marxist saboteurs, that is a tautology…
“Capital has a cost; therefore
the employment of capital is based on cost.”
The cost of capital isn’t based on cost – a tautology – it’s based on (1) the quantity of capital loaned; and (2) the time it takes to pay back the capital loaned.
The cost of capital – interest – depends on the magnitude borrowed (and time needed to pay back the loan). If one borrows a capital outlay of X, the cost of X will be less than a capital outlay of 6X, but if a central bank maintains interest rates at the artificially low X level, there can be no loans for capital outlays between X and 6X. By implementing low cost interest rates, central banks have set in motion ruinous price controls on capital, thereby impeding the employment of capital.
* The climate isn’t changing, it’s simply warming due to massive new quantities of man-made structures on the ground that absorb solar radiation.
That does not answer my question. That was more of a rant than anything else. I have done quite a bit of research on the properties of CO2 and would like you to describe to me the process in which CO2 has a cooling effect in the atmosphere.
“I have done quite a bit of research on the properties of CO2 and would
like you to describe to me the process in which CO2 has a cooling effect
in the atmosphere.”
I did. Carbon Dioxide’s volume is LESS than either Nitrogen and Oxygen’s volume, thereby proving that Carbon Dioxide can only hold LESS heat than Nitrogen and Oxygen.
You were supposed to have read my article on the subject, which includes the lies I discovered NASA and other ‘educational’ websites regurgitate regarding Nitrogen and Oxygen.
That does not describe a cooling effect. Volume has nothing to do with IR radiation wavelength absorption. It has to do with the net charge of a molecule. You can heat up O2, and N but neither of them have any charge sharing. The two atoms of O in O2 are the same charge, and N is a single atom. The radiation passing through them excites the molecules causing them to warm up, but the radiation continues on without any other interaction. A greenhouse gas has 2 or more atoms bonded together that have different charges. CO2 has 1 atom of Carbon bonded to 2 atoms of Oxygen. The Carbon atom has a slight positive charge, and the two Oxygen atoms a slight negative charge. Because of this the CO2 molecule will absorb some of the wavelengths of IR radiation and re-radiate them. Yes, CO2 does not HOLD heat! The volume of O2, and Nitrogen in the atmosphere is meaningless because they do not absorb, and re-radiate any IR radiation.
One of the biggest misconceptions about so called greenhouse gases is that they trap, and hold heat. They really act kind of like a sprinkler, only it takes in IR radiation and redirects it out in all directions.
The other thing you are talking about. The man made structures causing the warming. That is called the UHE, or Urban Heat island Effect. This has been known for years. Long story short, the UHE does not effect climate on a global scale. It does effect local climate, and has been part of the debate about correcting for it in the temperature records since the beginning of the climate debate!
So, based on what I know I think you are a complete idiot, and I am offended that you come here and claim that I am some kind of Marxist offering some kind of “fake opposition” to the global climate scam! It’s ridiculous, and ludicrous, and you are an idiot who has not the slightest clue about what you are talking about.
“That does not describe a cooling effect. Volume has nothing to do with IR radiation wavelength absorption.”
Where did I say it did? Yet again, you didn’t read my article! READ MY ARTICLE BEFORE YOU REPLY TO ME AGAIN!
“The [Marxist] false opposition position on global warming is its refusal to alert readers to the fake science regarding Carbon Dioxide’s COOLING effect in Earth’s atmosphere”
That’s where you said it you dolt. Get out of here you freakin moron. And I’m not going to read your article because it’s full of bullshit, just like you.
“Get out of here you freakin moron. And I’m not going to read your article because it’s full of bullshit, just like you.”
Another vulgar Marxist operative on the thread. Who would have guessed!
Hmm, NASA has admitted that no such change is caused by man, nor is CO2 a pollutant, something most learn in 3rd or 4th grade. In fact NASA has new article of the miraculous CO2 re-greening of the earth effect. It’s all been a scam but to those with no appreciation of history, they of course repeat sins of the past, and believe the revisionist history lies.
“In fact NASA has new article of the miraculous CO2 re-greening of the earth effect.”
Not just NASA, but countless independent studies the Marxist media doesn’t alert us to…
As for Carbon dioxide, it cools on planet Earth, leading us to wonder the identity of those who say otherwise.
I’ll be right back…. I forgot to bring my tin-foil hat.
no need to return if U believe in Climate hoax or global warming, or we are gone in 12 years! Only need look back in 70’s and every single Dem propaganda since, which is why they need U ignorant. Removing statues makes U ignorant. Racist & slave owners were included as our founders but every single item in the constitution is for equal rights for ALL. Those racist slave owning bigots were able to remove from the law their own views and bias, something not seen today where DEMS hide who they are and pretend to be someone they’re not! Dems in congress have more people with changed names then most of America has, including DeBlasio, Orourke and many more! they had to change their names to hide their own hideous past, versus openly being honest.
I don’t follow the hysteria….. the climate has always been changing.