31 Responses to Warmists Fantasize about Blowing up Skeptics

  1. NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 1, 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    I know we are supposed to refrain from swearing here.. but I have to say: what the hell was that? Exploding people who don’t want to go along with this stupid 10:10 bullcrap? This is evil. THIS IS SICK!!!! What is the message here? That you should be killed because you don’t believe that lowering your standard of living and kowtowing to the environmental agenda is going to do anything to affect the climate? I just can’t think of anything else to say about it. I am speechless at the moment. But I think I will have more to say later.

  2. Hal Groar October 1, 2010 at 7:43 pm #

    So this is what osama bin laden was talking about. Radical Islamic style green peace. Works for me. Can you imagine what would happen if they tried to play that commercial here? I wonder how many complaints would come in. It might even hurt the cause! Hmm….

  3. paul wenum October 1, 2010 at 8:57 pm #

    Only in the UK. I have no problem. This just shows the total ignorance of the general population that as the scene begins, in school! Cradle to grave. Hear it all the time. Hope the don’t come to my house. My button is a little bit bigger than theirs.

    • Dan McGrath October 2, 2010 at 1:23 am #


  4. NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 2, 2010 at 5:33 pm #

    Do you think I have overreacted to this? I don’t think I have. This really bothers me on several levels. But it seems to have little to no effect on the rest of you so I guess I won’t bother going over it in depth. I’ll just say that it may desensitize some to violence, and it suggests that people who don’t believe in the bullcrap should just be summarily executed. Killed outright. No consideration should be given to any objection, they should just be put to death immediately. I am just completely disgusted by this.

    • Dan McGrath October 2, 2010 at 7:33 pm #

      Not at all. Despicable. Being that warmists are generally for population control, this message is pretty clear: It’s acceptable and even funny to kill climate change skeptics.

    • hilary October 5, 2010 at 1:55 pm #

      Geez a lou. I agree. I’m very disturbed. It suggests it’s ok to kill people who disagree with you not to mention its disgusting.

  5. Hal Groar October 2, 2010 at 6:40 pm #

    Neil I don’t think you overreacted at all. I take it serious, but I kept in mind that it came from the UK. I have not figured out the Brits yet and why they are so coiled up in the global warming nonsense. They seem reasonable, yet they believe in all this baloney! I thought my greenie=terrorist insinuation fit the bill. I agree with you though, it is disgusting.

  6. NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 2, 2010 at 8:37 pm #

    Thank you Dan, and Hal. I mean, is this not the additude the Nazis had towards the Jews? People who are deniers, who don’t believe are the problem, so let’s line em up and shoot, gas, and bake them in ovens? This is what is so unsettling for me.

  7. Rob N. Hood October 3, 2010 at 8:20 am #

    OMG over-reacting is not a strong enough word for what you guys are doing. Hysterical is more like it. It is usually the right and far right who make these kinds of statements. It occurs so often that us Leftys hardly take any notice of it. It’s like a fact of life for a Lefty to feel threatened in one way or another from those on the right. At any extreme point you will find people with a penchant for violence. And actually acting on that is a whole other thing too. Leftists mostly adhere to the non-violent approach, with some groups resorting to vandalism, but not physical violence per se. Of course the large protests always make the news especially when it is viewed as Leftists causing damage, etc. But those people are anarchists, which btw exist on both ends of the spectrum. Not to mention the old trick of the elite to hire instigators who end up doing most of the violence in those situations, just to make the Left seem scarier than it is. The MSM loves it, and focuses on that like nothing else. It’s all pretty clear when you stop and think about it with a clear head.

    • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 3, 2010 at 2:18 pm #

      Rob your response is exactly what I thought it would be. Predictable.

  8. paul wenum October 3, 2010 at 8:08 pm #

    Neil, Amen. Look at ELF Robbie Boy. Lefties aren’t violent? Give us all a break! As Neil said, “predictable.” That you are. Alinsky loves ya!

  9. Rob N. Hood October 4, 2010 at 8:17 am #

    Whatever guys. I agree that this is a disgusting video or whatever you want to call it. It’s so bad I have to wonder about the people behind it and all that. It seems to me to be like a psy-ops thing. The CIA et. al. do this kind of thing, fund it etc. Of course the desired result is not to attract people to environmental causes- just the opposite. At least that seems like a very likely possibility with this piece of garbage. I’ve not ever seen in my entire life anything even close to this coming from an envirnmental group. Of course they highlight unpleaseant statistics and the realities of pollution, etc. But a genuine environmental group would never put out something like this. If it is genuine, the marketing “geniuses” behind it should be fired.

  10. paul wenum October 4, 2010 at 8:29 pm #

    For the first time on this site you finally agree. Will wonders ever cease?

  11. Rob N. Hood October 6, 2010 at 9:40 am #

    It’s obviously made to make the deniers even more paranoid. Not helpful.

    • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 6, 2010 at 10:02 pm #

      I declare global warming, er, climate change, um, er, global climate disruption…?…. to be categorically false, and completely fabricated!!!!! I guess I am a denier. How ’bout dat!!!
      Paranoia: A psychotic disorder characterized by delusions of persecution with or without grandeur, often strenuously defended with apparent logic and reason.
      So what do you call it when the persecution is not a delusion from a psychotic disorder?
      1. To oppress or harass with ill-treatment, especially because of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or BELIEFS.
      2. To annoy persistently; bother.
      Is this video not a form of harassment?
      1. To irritate or torment persistently.
      2. To wear out; exhaust.
      3. To impede and exhaust (an enemy) by repeated attacks or raids.
      So, denier…..YES!!!!!! Paranoid…….NOPE!!!!!! Not even a little.

  12. paul wenum October 6, 2010 at 10:05 pm #

    Neil, I guess based upon the MSM we are all of the above. Never changes. They took the site down. Wonder why?

    • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 7, 2010 at 4:52 pm #

      Too much of a backlash from paranoid people like me I guess.

  13. Rob N. Hood October 8, 2010 at 6:56 am #

    Methinks thou protests a bit too much. However, I am encouraged by all your responses to this piece of sh*t “skit” or whatever you want to call it. I have absolutely no idea why anyone would think it was a good idea to make. So hats off to you guys- you aren’t as over the edge as I thought.

    • NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 8, 2010 at 4:46 pm #

      I don’t buy it Rob. Are you attempting a Jedi mind trick? Are you just trying to get us to agree with you on something? To be thrown back in our faces at a later date perhaps? You are being reasonable…. and I don’t like it!!!!

  14. Rob N. Hood October 15, 2010 at 7:05 am #

    paranoia will destroya

  15. NEIL F. AGWD/BSD October 21, 2010 at 5:45 am #

    “The video, which (of course) was funded with money stolen from British taxpayers, has now been removed from its previous home by its creators after some members of the public found the “joke” to be offensive. But the real joke is on the environmentalist movement. The ecofascists are learning the hard way that people do not like to be confronted by the realities of coercion in modern authoritarian ideologies. They want their fascism with nice cuddly slogans, and plenty of euphemisms. Jokes about killing dissenters, it turns out, are only funny when you are not actually touting an authoritarian ideology that uses coercion as its central tool.”

    • Rob N. Hood October 27, 2010 at 9:39 am #

      The left is fascist? Really? Nice trick cuz not literally possible. Fascism is extreme RIGHT. Totalitarianism is extreme LEFT. There can be dictators on both sides (I think- I could be wrong about that one). Your lesson for the day… See? Learning can be fun!

  16. paul wenum October 23, 2010 at 11:07 pm #

    Neil, Go to Europe and watch their TV. Nothing is offensive. Trust me.

  17. Rob N. Hood October 28, 2010 at 8:46 am #

    Seeing some boobs on TV is one of modern life’s few remaining pleasures.

  18. Rob N. Hood October 28, 2010 at 8:48 am #

    And I’m not talking about O’Reilly and Beck, although if the shoe, or in this case, bra fits…

  19. Rob N. Hood October 29, 2010 at 7:24 am #

    tee hee

  20. paul wenum October 29, 2010 at 7:24 pm #

    Must say, original. Substitute Pelosi, Reid?

  21. Rob N. Hood November 1, 2010 at 9:03 am #

    Elected officials verses highly overly paid TV personalities. Hmmmm…… slight difference eh?

  22. paul wenum November 1, 2010 at 9:34 pm #

    Your choice. Vote your convictions tomorrow.

A project of Minnesota Majority, hosted and maintained by Minnesotans for Global Warming.