UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims

EPW - US SenateStudy: Half of warming due to Sun! –Sea Levels Fail to Rise? – Warming Fears in ‘Dustbin of History’

POZNAN, Poland – The UN global warming conference currently underway in Poland is about to face a serious challenge from over 650 dissenting scientists from around the globe who are criticizing the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.  Set for release this week, a newly updated U.S. Senate Minority Report features the dissenting voices of over 650 international scientists, many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN. The report has added about 250 scientists (and growing) in 2008 to the over 400 scientists who spoke out in 2007. The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.

The U.S. Senate report is the latest evidence of the growing groundswell of scientific opposition rising to challenge the UN and Gore. Scientific meetings are now being dominated by a growing number of skeptical scientists. The prestigious International Geological Congress, dubbed the geologists’ equivalent of the Olympic Games, was held in Norway in August 2008 and prominently featured the voices and views of scientists skeptical of man-made global warming fears. [See Full report Here: & See: Skeptical scientists overwhelm conference: ‘2/3 of presenters and question-askers were hostile to, even dismissive of, the UN IPCC’ ]

Full Senate Report Set To Be Released in the Next 24 Hours – Stay Tuned… 

A hint of what the upcoming report contains:    

“I am a skeptic…Global warming has become a new religion.” – Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.   

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” –  Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology  and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”  

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history…When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” – UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.  

“The IPCC has actually become a closed circuit; it doesn’t listen to others. It doesn’t have open minds… I am really amazed that the Nobel Peace Prize has been given on scientifically incorrect conclusions by people who are not geologists,” – Indian geologist Dr. Arun D. Ahluwalia at Punjab University and a board member of the UN-supported International Year of the Planet.  

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC “are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.” – Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico  

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.” – U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA. 

“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.” – . Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri’s asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it’s hard to remain quiet.” – Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society’s Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.  

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?” – Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden.

Read the rest at the United State Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works.

18 Responses to UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims

  1. Neil F. December 10, 2008 at 9:28 pm #

    I can’t believe it! Somebody pinch me! I’m getting a little choked up, and misty eyed reading this. Especially Dr. Gee’s quote. “For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?”
    I think the tables are finally begining to turn on the global warmingists. Thank God, and Sen. Inhofe.

  2. Jackson December 10, 2008 at 11:51 pm #

    Finally…now if we could just get the media to expose chicken little (Algore) for the nut job and armchair alarmist he is, maybe we could concentrate on getting industry creating some more new jobs….

  3. Matt Puntney December 11, 2008 at 1:12 pm #

    Wow. I’m so pleased that real scientists with real, fact based opinions are using the ‘safety in numbers’ approach and finally doing what needs to be done to debunk this global warming scam once and for all. Too bad this little story most likely will not be picked up by the Times or CNN. Each one of these 650 individuals ought to be rewarded and praised. And thanks to people like Sen. Inhofe and Chris Horner, who continue to attempt the fight against these crazy Greens.

  4. Neil F. December 12, 2008 at 9:37 am #

    Hello?! Has everbody gone for the Holidays? Your making me feel like I have no life. I really don’t, but it surely doesn’t need reinforcment. It’s getting kinda lonely here.

  5. Dan McGrath December 12, 2008 at 10:23 am #

    Sorry, gang. Got behind in the comment moderation. This is good news. I’ll have the final report linked up here soon, too.

  6. Neil F. December 12, 2008 at 6:56 pm #

    Thanks a lot Dan, there wern’t any other comments here when I wrote that last thing. Now I look loke a dope. But now I don’t feel so lonely. Still wondering where the warming enthusiasts are though. Think maybe they’ve been left speechless?

  7. Terrenc Deagle December 18, 2008 at 3:59 am #

    Exactly. I knew it all along. We should be talking about Global Cooling. They showed a chunk of ice breaking off this summer on July 30th, 2008 up in northern Canada. Well, anybody with a brain would know that the month of July is the hottest month of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. If they had shown that picture on January 30th then we would have something to worry about. What a scam!

  8. John miszt December 23, 2008 at 8:22 pm #

    Speechless is pretty much right.

    Although my greatest fear from this kind of (scientific? Not sure if it qualifies as that, is it a compilation of 650 opinions, or have they done some thourgh research?) report, is that it hides the real problem.

    I would love for the evidence to be wrong, either way we look at it, we can at least agree that our climate is changing, can we? But, it seems only the people who believe it’s our fault are trying to do something about it…pherhaps it would be more prouctive to deal with the situation, rather than sitting around laughing and pointing at one another?

  9. Dan McGrath December 24, 2008 at 1:07 pm #

    Of course the climate changes! That’s what it’s always done. To just notice that phenomonon in the last couple decades and think that: 1. It’s unusual; 2. It’s a problem; 3. We can do something about it, is to ignore millions of years of geologic history of the planet that we were all taught in grade school. It’s beyond my comprehension how people get sucked into panic and are willing to accept radical economic, behavioral, political and lifestyle changes because of the weather.

  10. David Walker December 25, 2008 at 12:19 am #

    I’m amazed you still refer to the global warming context as a “scientific” pursuit. Its origins may be in science, but its contemporary reason has much more to do with manipulation of the masses, one of the oldest tricks in the book: Create the perception of a crisis so that those in power can maintain control and convince their subjects to get in line for a fleecing. Sadly, it appears a lot of folks still haven’t evolved. The global warming context is a $6 trillion shell game whereby the establishment will maintain its power as energy paradigms shift and new wealth is created. All at the expense of consumers and the poor.

    The contemporary global warming context dwarfs Madoff’s $50 billion scam; it is the greatest fraud in modern human history.

  11. John miszt December 25, 2008 at 6:25 am #

    Certainly that’s true, the question is, when are we going to start prepearing for it? Looking back thru history shows us that climate change is rather catastrophic for a large percentage of the species on this planet…us included

  12. John miszt December 25, 2008 at 9:28 am #

    another issue, the economy is not ‘real’, oil, coal and other resources are, and they will soon run out. What you going to do then? It makes allot more sense IMO to work on renewable energy, which won’t run out, that way everyone wins, both in terms of climate and the economy (which is somthing I don’t think will exist. In the same way soon anyway, but that’s a whole other topic lol)

  13. Joseph Duncan December 25, 2008 at 5:49 pm #

    That is a real good point John, kinda cuts out all the opinion either way and gets to the point.

  14. Dan McGrath December 25, 2008 at 11:28 pm #

    Warmer climates have historically been periods when human civilization thrived and progressed. What’s more worrisome is a cooling climate. Should we prepare for this eventuallity? Maybe, but it’s certainly not by curbing CO2 emissions with carbon taxes and swapping lightbulbs!

  15. Joseph Duncan December 26, 2008 at 11:28 am #

    For sure but following on from John’s point, we are going to run out of carbon based fuel in the not too distant future. Surely better to start incentives to turn to renewable and alternative energy forms now?

  16. David Walker January 12, 2009 at 1:57 pm #

    With all respect due, using the government to determine who gets to do what, under specific conditions and restrictions, won’t solve a darn thing. As history proves, giving the government the reigns makes the poor poorer and the rich richer. It’s confines competition and innovation to the whim of those making the rules.

    I want a car that only costs $1.25 to fill up and has a 400 mile range. I want a house that stays cool in the summer and warm in the winter, and is not connected to a power grid. If you think the government is better at providing such an outcome, you’re wrong. Allow the markets to do their magic and we will get there in due time. Otherwise, all your effort is in vain.

    The global warming context is the greatest fraud in modern human history.

  17. Debbie J. March 5, 2009 at 2:52 pm #

    This is just a way for people like Al Gore to take advantage of others. He made over $100 million on global warming last year, so yeah he believes in it. The earth is in fact cooling and they have the nerve to say that global warming is making it colder! Get a grip. The liberals have invented a crisis, then used the crisis to fleece America and other countries. As Mr. Emanuel says, “Don’t let a good crisis go to waste.”

A project of Minnesota Majority, hosted and maintained by Minnesotans for Global Warming.