TopTenAlGore2

Top Ten Reasons Climate Change is a Hoax

TopTenAlGore2

By Elmer Beauregard

The Senate voted this week on whether Climate Change is real or a hoax, I think it’s a hoax and here’s why.

I’m sure you’ve heard in the news that 2014 was supposed to be the hottest year ever. If it actually was “hottest year ever” you’d think all the terrible calamities that are supposed to happen would be happening now but instead the opposite is happening.

1. Record Ice

In 2014 there was record sea ice in Antarctica  in fact a global warming expedition got stuck in it. Arctic sea ice has also made a nice comeback in 2014. The Great lakes had record ice Lake Superior only had 3 ice free months in 2014. You’d think that in the hottest year ever that ice would be melting like Al Gore said.

2. Record Snow

2014 saw record snowfall in many areas, remember when they said that global warming would cause snow to disappear and children won’t know what snow is.

3. Record Cold

In 2014 we saw all kinds of cold records remember the Polar Vortex? You’d think that we’d be breaking all kinds of heat records in “the hottest year ever”

4. Oceans Are Rising Much Less Than Predicted

Al Gore predicted that oceans would rise 20 feet by 2100, it looks like were on track for about a foot. 80% of the tide gauges show less rise than the official “global average”. Many tide gauges show no rise in sea level, and almost none show any acceleration over the past 20 years.

5. Polar Bears Are Thriving

You’d think that Polar Bears would really be in trouble in 2014 “the hottest year ever” but they are thriving.

6. Moose Are Making A Comeback

A few years ago the moose population in Minnesota dropped rapidly and they immediately blamed global warming, then they did a study and found out it was actually wolves that were killing the moose. Wolves have been taken off the endangered species list and are now endangering other species so they opened a wolf hunting season in Minnesota and the moose are coming back. It turns out it had nothing to do with global warming in fact the years when the moose population declined were some very cold ones.

7. 99% of Scientists don’t believe in Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming

You’ve probably heard over and over that 99% of scientist believe in global warming well the opposite is true. That talking point came from a study where only 75 scientists said they believe in global warming on the other hand over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition saying they don’t believe in Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming.

8. Nature produces much more CO2 than man

In 2014 NASA finally launched a satellite that measures CO2 levels around the globe. They assumed that most of the CO2 would be coming from the industrialized northern hemisphere but much to their surprise it was coming from the rainforests in South America, Africa and China.

9. It Isn’t Actually the Warmest Year.

If you look at the satellite data 2014 was not the warmest year ever in fact there has been no global warming for over 18 years. The Reason they can say it’s the warmest year is because they are using the ground weather station data which is heavily influenced by the Urban Heat Island effect, many of which are near pavement. Even still they had to cherry pick that data to get at the warmest year ever and it is only the warmest by only two-100ths of a degree within a dataset that has a variability of a half of a degree. The fact they they had to ignore accurate data and fudge sketchy data to push their agenda proves (IMHO) that climate change is a hoax.

10. The Hypocrisy of the Main Players

One of the main reasons you can tell that global warming is a hoax is that the main purveyors of global warming live lifestyles opposite of what they preach, they all own multiple large homes and yachts and they fly around the world in private jets pushing their propaganda. Not to mention some people such as Al Gore actually profit from Carbon Taxes and other green energy laws. If they actually believed what they preached they would be leading quite different lives.

  • Stephen Kay

    Global warming is an absolute fact; All vaccines are 100% safe and effective; The border is secure; All government agencies ( EPA, FDA, TSA, IRS, etc) always look out for our best interest, Prescription drugs are safe and effective; chemotherapy is the best and only treatment for cancer., etc……All bullshit statements uttered by the government who has not told the truth in decades…..Follow the money.

    • John

      Very true, especially the Chemo thing. My aunt and mom were killed by that stuff.

  • Steve Weston

    Farmers Almanac is a better predictor than anyone . Read it and learn..
    Grasshoppers.

  • Rick R.

    Anytime a person is paid to present “facts” for research money, they are literally bought and paid for. They must keep presenting “evidence” and “conjecture” to keep the grant money, celebrity status, book sales, lectures, and documentaries to survive. If they fail, they fail professionally and, as the boy who cried wolf, no one will listen to them and their previous supporters have moved on to another trendy topic leaving them out in the cold.

  • cv66airdale

    China is your proof that global warming is a control scheme. All of these Politicians that push GW also support Nafta, and other unconstitutional “Free trade agreements, that send our production jobs to 3rd world nations that couldn’t give a shit about GW. Do some research into China’s massive pollution problems, then ask your reps why our government is on both sides of the global warming coin.

  • cv66airdale

    Al Gore, as we all know was Bill Clinton’s VP, when Clinton signed Nafta into law. If you remember, as many times we see Obama on the golf course, Bill, and Killary Clinton spent the same amount of time in China swinging deals with the Reds. The Clinton’s sold MERVE technology to China, witch is a military super computer tech that allows a nation to launch nuclear weapons from anywhere in the world. That’s the real reason for his Impeachment, Monica Lewinsky was just a bread and circus cover up for the real crime.

  • climatechangeisreal

    Climate Change is real. There is irrefutable evidence against it.
    1) Yes there was record ice in Antarctica. However, this goes against the general shrinkage of ice throughout the world.
    http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/antarctic-sea-ice-reaches-new-record-maximum/
    2)Climate Change doesn’t just call for global warming, it calls for more extreme weather events, including snow.
    http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
    3) Same argument as 2, but using polar vortex.
    4)Oceans are still rising at historically high levels, threatening to disrupt life for coastal cities and several pacific islands.
    5)Polar Bears are only increasing in a small part of the Arctic
    http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/status-and-threats/polar-bear-status-report
    6)Doesn’t have to do with climate whatsoever, so is irrelevant to the topic of climate change
    7)This isn’t true. 97% of scientists believe in climate change, the percentage doesn’t denote whether or not they think it is human induced. There are other theories of Climate Change
    http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/reprint/seven_theories.pdf
    https://www.wunderground.com/resources/climate/928.asp
    8)Yes, China is a huge pollutant of CO2.
    http://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/136/
    9)2014 has been the warmest year ON-RECORD, as in since 1880s. Most people realize this and know that 2014 isn’t the warmest year EVER.

    • Matthew Adams

      Thank you

  • https://go.berniesanders.com/page/content/splash MiKe

    Hate to tell you, but one year of weather doesn’t prove sh@t. If you can give me trends that show a decrease in temperature, then we can talk. But you can’t, can you?

  • John M. Zeigler

    I would like global warming scientists to explain the global warming that occurred beween 800 and 1400 AD and ensuing 200 year cooling period that followed. There were no cars, trucks or factories polluting the air back then. The world’s population wasn’t anywhere near what it is today. Oh BTW, CO2 is good, it’s plant food. Plants take in CO2 and give off our life need, oxygen. More CO2 means more and lusher plantlife which means more oxygen for humans and animals to breath. It’s a symbiotic relationship.

  • Wonderous Derp

    ok. so, i researched global warming lots of times before. and i found that earth climate is actually getting COLDER. photochemical smog is being released by many factories, which is basically ozone. ozone ABSORBS heat.

    • Matthew Adams

      Ozone absorbs radiation, which may help in terms of preventing climate change, but the photochemical smog is the product of the reaction of sunlight and ozone, effectively turning ozone into smog, meaning there is less ozone to help in the prevention of climate change.

  • Erustus Kirwa

    It is unfortunate that a prospective USA President,ONE A mR dONALD tRUMP , is buying this cheap propaganda!

    • Matthew Adams

      It’s unfortunate that Donald Trump exists.

  • Matthew Adams

    You people at globalclimatesscam are stuck up pricks with no care for anything else in this world. You want to just keep living you high rich life with no care to anyone or anything else in the world. You want to live believing that capitalism is the best way of life and that nothing could stop you from living in your fancy palaces. Scientists no for sure that climate change is real – go to NASA, National Ice and Snow Data Center, etc. You think that there is nothing wrong with you killing off all this world, or that you want to live in complete ignorance to he bad parts of this world, and thinking that because you are a rich stuck up prick, nothing could possibly happen to you. Welcome to the real world. There is no realistic evidence that climate change isn’t real, and plenty saying that it is. Wake up from your idiocy.

    • The Irishman

      Wow… this one’s waterlogged w koolaid & sweating out the food-coloring! o.O

  • GraceA

    You’re all idiots. All you Donald Trump supporters ignoring the real science behind Climate Change. You’re all probably happy about the alleged “thriving polar bears” because that way you get to enact your precious second amendment and shoot up some polar bears with an AK-47.

  • sweetqueen777

    I agree wholeheartedly. We have SERIOUS problems invthis country, of an IMMEDIATE and URGENT nature. Climate Change MIGHT BE a problem in about 200 years. We will all kill EACH OTHER before that ever happens. What a CROCK. PLANTS Create Oxygen, which we nreathe. We expell CO2, whivh the plants need. The BEST thing we can do is STOP cutting down the trees. Recycle as much as we can, and fix things instead of throwing everything away

  • Deb Ashlynn

    Let me explain it to you in words you can understand. When global warming occurs the world first gets a ton more water before it dries up. When the Ice caps melt this causes more water, in the form of more snow and rain. This will only last until the caps melt completely and since it is too warm for them to refreeze the water we do have will then dry up. So at first it will seem like we have an abundance of water and then we turn into Venus or other rock like planet in our solar system. WE need to stop using fossil fuels and go green. We have the technology so there’s on reason to continue to damage our home Most scientists now know that this is occurring so for you to site that 99 percent of scientists don’t believe it is occurring is erroneous. And the scientists know more than you on the matter

  • Cheyenne Kid

    Mistrix, you are a toad, a toad is someone who keeps on posting trying to dominate the issue. The earth has gone through several natural shifts of climate change. It is natural and a lot of your data and statements are not backed up except by what you think is so important to say, over and over, and over ……………again!

    • Mistrix

      Toad. Lol. That’s cute, haven’t heard that one before.

      I have made a lot of replies on this article. Made some a year ago or so, and i continue to get a reply in my inbox every few days too so it just goes on and on… lol

      Sorry if I hogged up all of the comments! :)

  • Rochelle Weinbaum

    Ya nie panimayu (paniMAyu) fsie echi viesh-chi (VIESH-chi) (Russian); English translation: I do not understand all these things.

  • iquack

    Of course, man-caused climate change alarmism is a hoax. Democrats need a cause; a reason to hike taxes and increase their control over us with onerous regulations. Follow the money to phony “scientists” who feed off taxpayer largess.

  • MIKE BOATRIGHT

    What are your sources elmer b?

  • Tom Baker

    Bingo!

  • Ridwan Shahid

    My professor told me that increasing temperatures would increase water evaporation near the equator. The water vapour will be carried out to the poles and cause more precipitation and more snow. This would cause cooler air to flow away from the poles, cooling the Earth. So perhaps we won’t really be seeing a continuous rise in global temperature.

    However, this might mean that the Earth would cool significantly and less hot air and water will rise from the Equator. That may prevent further cooling. The Earth might have a buffer here. I’m not too sure though. And I don’t know how strong this buffer is. I think scientists should investigate.

  • Mistrix

    So, Elmer Beauregard, do you get any money from political groups or oil companies? Just curious who funds your articles.

  • Whyatt Yescarri

    It would be wonderful if global warming is not happening, since it would have a significant negative impact on many of the earth’s inhabitants in terms of geographical, lifestyle, economic, health and other potential changes. Some would benefit; but rising sea levels, overall weather pattern changes and severe weather events and their associated impacts are projected to significantly increase as part of most of those GW models– and is generally not good for most countries and their people. If it doesn’t happen, then short to long term lifestyles and planning of all types can proceed as usual, which would be a lot better for most of us than the alternative, based on what’s projected to happen. However, the truth is where I wish to get to, regardless of the potential impact.

    I have done a fair amount of reading and watching of videos on both sides of the argument (several hundred hours so far), and during my research related to this subject I have found quite a range of quality in terms of the application of both logic and research approaches, as well as data-driven support for the arguments associated with them. Although most articles, journals, books, sites and videos have some amount of erroneous/invalid assertions, logic and conclusions; based on my research to date, the following is one of the compilations that appears to be among the most well-supported by available data. https://www.skepticalscience.com

    In addition to researching the validity and accuracy of data and assertions, I have tried to always consider the sources and any associated biases, agendas and such. I have found that over time there is an increasing amount of poorly supported thinking and reasoning, often based more on emotional reactions than data and science based reasoning. I have tried to eschew that kind of “thinking” whenever possible. Similarly, although I often see a lot more emotional response and ad hominem attacks than support for a given position, this is too important to me (and I’d assume most others), to simply vent in the form of poorly supported emotionally-driven arguments.

    So, given where I am at with my research, I would like to get the input from people here who have become more/better educated than I am on this subject, to help determine any erroneous thinking and assertions. As noted, the following provides a useful summary that mirrors much of what I have found to date, although it does not provide the full spectrum of rigorous mathematical support and extensive data sets, as do some of the peer reviewed resources I have studied. However, I believe it provides an efficient summary for discussion.

    I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide any well-supported research, data and associated resources that contradict those provided on that site. Similarly, any better/useful compilations would also be appreciated.

    Thanks for any clarifications and input on this subject.

  • Olivier Girardot

    Basically 1,2 and 3 are exactly the same point.

  • Vincent Bryson

    So how does Carbon/Oxygen/Oxygen interfere with the bonding of Oxygen/oxygen/oxygen (I wrote it out for you).
    C-O-O and O-O-O
    So am I to believe that it is possible for CO2 to interfere with the bonding of O3 ?!
    I am being told that that diatomic oxygen contain the properties to prevent Triatomic oxygen from bonding just because this diatomic oxygen contains a Carbon?????!!!!
    Carbon – the 6th most common element on Earth. It’s everywhere in Universe.
    No ONE has an issue with less pollution but come on man! Really?!

  • George

    The controversy is within bad administrations feeding politicians phoney facts and them going along with it . It makes money for state, provincial and federal coffers . Yes we have real facts , that they don’t want to have a look at . The infamous Sierra Nevada Club propagated , a lot of wolf implants from Canada into the United States much to negative impact to wildlife in general . The Sierra Nevada Club , does pay for cattle taken down , quenching some problems from farmers and ranchers . But their not paying monetary compensation for wildlife (moose, etc.) . The Yellowstone wolf project , has now turned into a disaster . They have way too too much money…..so the taxpayer should get all their money , just to justify things , and shut down their formats in implementing any federal policy , because of too much money . We all know of the record cold weather , showing the governments inability to admit to superior reality and truths ……but the most troubling is that the Federal Governments on both sides of the border are not being held accountable for these blatant superior realities and lawsuits that should going , to force them to shut down bad administrations and their form of policy . We know their ethics , principles , and mores , definitely are questionable , and should be taken down asap .

  • John

    Check these out:

    http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/pangburn.html

    http://globalclimatedrivers.blogspot.com

    The analysis is done by Dan Pangburn, who is a licensed mechanical engineer. In his research, he has found that fossil fuel burning has no significant affect on climate sensitivity.

    Also, here’s another site that’s against the Global Warming “scam”:

    http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com

  • Vincent Slater

    Yaeh TRUMP will bring this GW SCAM down…go TRUMP!!!

  • raymondschep

    All living things need oxygen to survive. Even plants need oxygen. However, plants that contain chlorophyll have a unique capability.When the sun shines on them they can take up carbon dioxide and convert it to carbohydrates (food) and oxygen. We are all taught this in grade school. At night plants go back to respiration and consume oxygen. If we stopped putting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and the plants ran out of carbon dioxide to use, then guess what. No more oxygen would be produced and it would be the end of life on earth. This is not speculation it is cold hard biological scinece. This just goes to show how absolutely stupid, idiotic, moronic and insane those are that oppose the release for carbon dioxide to the atmosphere due to some stupid unproven speculation called global warming.

    • raymondschep

      And another thing. If carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere should rise, it would accelerate the growth of plants because they have more carbon dioxide for photosynthesis. Therefore the more cabon dioxide released into the air, the more would be consumed by plants.

  • Sayan

    Given how I figured out that the moon landing was a hoax, I would not be surprised if global warming was a hoax.

A project of Minnesota Majority, hosted and maintained by Minnesotans for Global Warming.