<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New study shows half of the global warming in the USA is artificial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-61599</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-61599</guid>
		<description>http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/temp_vs_CO2.html
Based on the analysis of entrapped air from ice cores extracted from permanent glaciers from various regions around the globe, it has been demonstrated that global warming began 18,000 years ago, accompanied by a steady rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Humans are quite likely the cause of a large portion of the 80 ppm rise in CO2 since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, and from a distance, it looks possible that increasing CO2 may cause atmospheric temperatures rise. However, on closer examination it is seen that CO2 lags an average of about 800 years behind the temperature changes-- confirming that CO2 is not the primary driver of the temperature changes.

The real signature of greenhouse warming is not surface temperature but temperature in the middle of the troposphere, about 5 kilometers up. If global warming is occurring from an increasing greenhouse effect due to CO2 additions by humans the temperature of the middle troposphere should be warming faster than Earth&#039;s surface (1,2). However, the opposite has been happening-- which suggests either the surface temperature records are in error or natural factors, such as changes in solar activity, may be responsible for the slight rise in surface temperatures (approximately 0.6° C, globally) that appears to have occurred over the past century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/temp_vs_CO2.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/temp_vs_CO2.html</a><br />
Based on the analysis of entrapped air from ice cores extracted from permanent glaciers from various regions around the globe, it has been demonstrated that global warming began 18,000 years ago, accompanied by a steady rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Humans are quite likely the cause of a large portion of the 80 ppm rise in CO2 since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, and from a distance, it looks possible that increasing CO2 may cause atmospheric temperatures rise. However, on closer examination it is seen that CO2 lags an average of about 800 years behind the temperature changes&#8211; confirming that CO2 is not the primary driver of the temperature changes.</p>
<p>The real signature of greenhouse warming is not surface temperature but temperature in the middle of the troposphere, about 5 kilometers up. If global warming is occurring from an increasing greenhouse effect due to CO2 additions by humans the temperature of the middle troposphere should be warming faster than Earth&#8217;s surface (1,2). However, the opposite has been happening&#8211; which suggests either the surface temperature records are in error or natural factors, such as changes in solar activity, may be responsible for the slight rise in surface temperatures (approximately 0.6° C, globally) that appears to have occurred over the past century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-61497</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-61497</guid>
		<description>There are also some interesting facts about CO2 and temperature that you are obviously not aware. 

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/last_100_yrs.html

&quot;Temperatures have increased by about 0.5° C over the last 100 years. Most of these increases occurred in the first 50 years of this time period.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) has also increased over the last 100 years-- from about 300 ppm to 370 ppm. Interestingly, the majority of these additions have occurred in the last 50 years, when temperature increases have been slowest.

Independent data from orbiting satelites have been continuosly measuring global temperatures since the 1970&#039;s and indicate that over the last 25 years there has actually been a slight decrease in overall global temperatures.

Assuming that at least part of the source of CO2 additions in the last 50 years is anthropogenic (man-made), the likely scenario is (at the level of additions involved) that CO2 concentrations in our atmosphere are an effect of temperature-- not the other way around. The perturbation of CO2 equilibrium has not had the proportional effect on temperature that greenhouse activists predict.&quot;

Also, you should know that part of my degree program at the technical college that I attended was an environmental sciences class. I got an A. And just from that class alone, and my teacher was a raving Liberal BTW, I can tell you that half of the things you think you know about the environment and atmospheric processes are just plain wrong. That class, more than anything else, opened my eyes to just how many lies, and misrepresentations are out there that people like you accept as us unassailable fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are also some interesting facts about CO2 and temperature that you are obviously not aware. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/last_100_yrs.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/last_100_yrs.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Temperatures have increased by about 0.5° C over the last 100 years. Most of these increases occurred in the first 50 years of this time period.</p>
<p>Carbon dioxide (CO2) has also increased over the last 100 years&#8211; from about 300 ppm to 370 ppm. Interestingly, the majority of these additions have occurred in the last 50 years, when temperature increases have been slowest.</p>
<p>Independent data from orbiting satelites have been continuosly measuring global temperatures since the 1970&#8242;s and indicate that over the last 25 years there has actually been a slight decrease in overall global temperatures.</p>
<p>Assuming that at least part of the source of CO2 additions in the last 50 years is anthropogenic (man-made), the likely scenario is (at the level of additions involved) that CO2 concentrations in our atmosphere are an effect of temperature&#8211; not the other way around. The perturbation of CO2 equilibrium has not had the proportional effect on temperature that greenhouse activists predict.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, you should know that part of my degree program at the technical college that I attended was an environmental sciences class. I got an A. And just from that class alone, and my teacher was a raving Liberal BTW, I can tell you that half of the things you think you know about the environment and atmospheric processes are just plain wrong. That class, more than anything else, opened my eyes to just how many lies, and misrepresentations are out there that people like you accept as us unassailable fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neilio</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-61440</link>
		<dc:creator>Neilio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 04:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-61440</guid>
		<description>You know it&#039;s funny that when we have cooler than normal temperatures, we&#039;re told by the global warming true believers, like yourself, to not confuse weather with climate. But when it&#039;s warmer than normal it&#039;s absolute proof of AGW. Here is a story from 06&#039; http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2655929&amp;page=1 in it says this: 

&quot;So what happened to global warming? 
Scientists who study climate say they get that question every time there&#039;s a cold spell. Their answer: It&#039;s important to keep in mind an important concept.
Weather is not climate. 
Weather, as we all know, is what we see in the day-to-day, often unpredictable fluctuations in local temperature, humidity, precipitation and wind.
&quot;The fact that we had a couple of cool months doesn&#039;t say anything at all about long-term trends,&quot; said Mark Serreze, a research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center. &quot;It&#039;s just a clear example of natural variability on the climate system. The long-term averages are decidedly toward a warming planet.&quot;-&quot;

So I would suggest to you Ashley that a couple of years of hot, dry weather doesn&#039;t say anything at all about long-term trends.  
Also, looking at weather history for Little Rock, (I picked Little Rock because it is in central Arkansas, and you said you live in the middle of Arkansas), July had 2.7&quot; of precipitation. And August so far has had 1.57&quot; of precipitation. It may not be very much, or enough, but I wouldn&#039;t call it nothing. 
Another thing too is that no one has claimed that there has been no effect from emissions. What the controversy centers on is to what extent that effect is, and to what kind of feedback will work toward strengthening the effect, (positive feedback,) or diminishing the effect, (negative feedback). AGW skeptics believe that the effect is very small, and there is a lot of scientific evidence that would suggest that this is true. Such as the diminishing effect of saturation in the IR bandwidths in the heat absorbing properties of CO2. There is also historic data that clearly show that there were periods in history that had higher temperatures with less CO2, and cooler temperatures with more CO2 than there is now.
As far as misspelling words, I spell rigid with a &quot;d&quot; in it because I am a service technician and every time I see that word it is on a hand tool. And the company that makes those tools is named Ridgid. They use a &quot;d&quot; in their name. So excuse the heck out of me for spelin uh wurd rong. We don&#039;t judge people on their spelling ability, or lack thereof here. Nobody is perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it&#8217;s funny that when we have cooler than normal temperatures, we&#8217;re told by the global warming true believers, like yourself, to not confuse weather with climate. But when it&#8217;s warmer than normal it&#8217;s absolute proof of AGW. Here is a story from 06&#8242; <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2655929&#038;page=1" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2655929&#038;page=1</a> in it says this: </p>
<p>&#8220;So what happened to global warming?<br />
Scientists who study climate say they get that question every time there&#8217;s a cold spell. Their answer: It&#8217;s important to keep in mind an important concept.<br />
Weather is not climate.<br />
Weather, as we all know, is what we see in the day-to-day, often unpredictable fluctuations in local temperature, humidity, precipitation and wind.<br />
&#8220;The fact that we had a couple of cool months doesn&#8217;t say anything at all about long-term trends,&#8221; said Mark Serreze, a research scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center. &#8220;It&#8217;s just a clear example of natural variability on the climate system. The long-term averages are decidedly toward a warming planet.&#8221;-&#8221;</p>
<p>So I would suggest to you Ashley that a couple of years of hot, dry weather doesn&#8217;t say anything at all about long-term trends.<br />
Also, looking at weather history for Little Rock, (I picked Little Rock because it is in central Arkansas, and you said you live in the middle of Arkansas), July had 2.7&#8243; of precipitation. And August so far has had 1.57&#8243; of precipitation. It may not be very much, or enough, but I wouldn&#8217;t call it nothing.<br />
Another thing too is that no one has claimed that there has been no effect from emissions. What the controversy centers on is to what extent that effect is, and to what kind of feedback will work toward strengthening the effect, (positive feedback,) or diminishing the effect, (negative feedback). AGW skeptics believe that the effect is very small, and there is a lot of scientific evidence that would suggest that this is true. Such as the diminishing effect of saturation in the IR bandwidths in the heat absorbing properties of CO2. There is also historic data that clearly show that there were periods in history that had higher temperatures with less CO2, and cooler temperatures with more CO2 than there is now.<br />
As far as misspelling words, I spell rigid with a &#8220;d&#8221; in it because I am a service technician and every time I see that word it is on a hand tool. And the company that makes those tools is named Ridgid. They use a &#8220;d&#8221; in their name. So excuse the heck out of me for spelin uh wurd rong. We don&#8217;t judge people on their spelling ability, or lack thereof here. Nobody is perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-61315</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 03:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-61315</guid>
		<description>About time my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About time my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-61117</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-61117</guid>
		<description>Snip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-61089</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 06:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-61089</guid>
		<description>Neilio,  You are getting there. Cut the cord from the troll. I did, what say you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neilio,  You are getting there. Cut the cord from the troll. I did, what say you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60961</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60961</guid>
		<description>What do you want from me? I can&#039;t really mix it up with you like I used to, sorry. I have been given an oportunity here to post stories and I feel like getting into arguments with you is just not appropriate for me to do anymore. My comment on Aug 5 was pushing it. I should probably apologize for calling you hate-filled. So just say what you want to say, and move on if you want to. I don&#039;t really care. The business here is to expose the fraud of AGW, not to get into a pissing contest with you on every post. Iv&#039;e been given a little bit of power here, and I can&#039;t abuse that. I can&#039;t even give the impression that I might abuse it. So if you come here and argue with me about everything and nothing, then I&#039;m sorry to say that&#039;s all over now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you want from me? I can&#8217;t really mix it up with you like I used to, sorry. I have been given an oportunity here to post stories and I feel like getting into arguments with you is just not appropriate for me to do anymore. My comment on Aug 5 was pushing it. I should probably apologize for calling you hate-filled. So just say what you want to say, and move on if you want to. I don&#8217;t really care. The business here is to expose the fraud of AGW, not to get into a pissing contest with you on every post. Iv&#8217;e been given a little bit of power here, and I can&#8217;t abuse that. I can&#8217;t even give the impression that I might abuse it. So if you come here and argue with me about everything and nothing, then I&#8217;m sorry to say that&#8217;s all over now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60896</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60896</guid>
		<description>chirp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chirp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60825</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 23:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60825</guid>
		<description>You are entitled to your opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are entitled to your opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60799</guid>
		<description>Well, you have referred to my postings as hateful, when they really aren&#039;t.  But like I said you can pretend you are clean as the driven snow, as usual.  It also ain&#039;t apathy either on your part- apathy would be not mentioning me in the first place, or responding to me at all.  But I know you will disagree with this assessment also.  Because that is what you do.  However, I guess we do agree on something- that is I play a role here one way or another, have for a long time, and without me this site was and is IMO pretty darn dull, and lacking in activity too.  Now that you have more than a bystander&#039;s obsessive role in it, I may do the worst thing I could do and not come back ever.  And so please enjoy this comment to the fullest, for your own personal entertainment if you will, also- because it could be my last one.  What&#039;s that I hear?  chirp chirp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you have referred to my postings as hateful, when they really aren&#8217;t.  But like I said you can pretend you are clean as the driven snow, as usual.  It also ain&#8217;t apathy either on your part- apathy would be not mentioning me in the first place, or responding to me at all.  But I know you will disagree with this assessment also.  Because that is what you do.  However, I guess we do agree on something- that is I play a role here one way or another, have for a long time, and without me this site was and is IMO pretty darn dull, and lacking in activity too.  Now that you have more than a bystander&#8217;s obsessive role in it, I may do the worst thing I could do and not come back ever.  And so please enjoy this comment to the fullest, for your own personal entertainment if you will, also- because it could be my last one.  What&#8217;s that I hear?  chirp chirp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60783</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60783</guid>
		<description>Well I wouldn&#039;t call that hate. You said call it want you want, so I want to call it apathy. You certainly have some absurd interperetations of what I say. Ridiculous, yet quite worthy in their entertainment value alone. That&#039;s awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I wouldn&#8217;t call that hate. You said call it want you want, so I want to call it apathy. You certainly have some absurd interperetations of what I say. Ridiculous, yet quite worthy in their entertainment value alone. That&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60779</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 13:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60779</guid>
		<description>&quot;Take yourself for example, you didn’t make any comments for 2/3rds of July. I really don’t know or care why, but I’m shure most others have things to do other than comment on my posts right now. Maybe with this horsecrap economy people are working a lot of overtime, like I have been, and just don’t have time, or are otherwise engaged in summertime activities. Where were you for 20 days? (That question is rhetorical, I don’t care what you were doing.)&quot;

That ain&#039;t love brother.  Call it what you want though, denial and self-rightousness are an awesome thing for the hypocritical.  chrip chirp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Take yourself for example, you didn’t make any comments for 2/3rds of July. I really don’t know or care why, but I’m shure most others have things to do other than comment on my posts right now. Maybe with this horsecrap economy people are working a lot of overtime, like I have been, and just don’t have time, or are otherwise engaged in summertime activities. Where were you for 20 days? (That question is rhetorical, I don’t care what you were doing.)&#8221;</p>
<p>That ain&#8217;t love brother.  Call it what you want though, denial and self-rightousness are an awesome thing for the hypocritical.  chrip chirp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60752</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 08:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60752</guid>
		<description>And I live in the middle of damned Arkansas, far away from any &quot;urban influences&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I live in the middle of damned Arkansas, far away from any &#8220;urban influences&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60751</link>
		<dc:creator>ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 08:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60751</guid>
		<description>Wow dude, I have a link to the outside where it has been intolerably hot for the last two summers, and hasn&#039;t rained for the past two months. Also it is rigid without a middle &#039;d&#039;. I don&#039;t understand how anyone could possibly think that the amount of fuel used in manufacturing and vehicles in the last hundred years for the first time in existence couldn&#039;t have an effect. I&#039;m guessing in addition to spelling and science you opted out of the &quot;consequences&quot; lessons as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow dude, I have a link to the outside where it has been intolerably hot for the last two summers, and hasn&#8217;t rained for the past two months. Also it is rigid without a middle &#8216;d&#8217;. I don&#8217;t understand how anyone could possibly think that the amount of fuel used in manufacturing and vehicles in the last hundred years for the first time in existence couldn&#8217;t have an effect. I&#8217;m guessing in addition to spelling and science you opted out of the &#8220;consequences&#8221; lessons as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NEILIO</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2012/07/new-study-shows-half-of-the-global-warming-in-the-usa-is-artificial-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60704</link>
		<dc:creator>NEILIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 22:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=2280#comment-60704</guid>
		<description>For a good laugh check this out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYup_vNcoEs&amp;feature=player_embedded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a good laugh check this out.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYup_vNcoEs&#038;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYup_vNcoEs&#038;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
