Comments on: Latest global warming scare report: If you live on the east coast, put on waders now

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:21:58 +0000

How is that statement different from others? Explain, if you can.

By: Joe

Joe — Mon, 16 Jul 2012 03:59:13 +0000

“Momopolistic.” Nice word. Your statement is a contradiction to your previous posts. Now you see why I as others view this site on occasion. If we need a daily lecture from a liberal/progressive we may as well go back to college, eh? I’m told they teach our young ones well.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:02:51 +0000

Meteorologists work for monoploistic mainstream and corporate owned mass media. No greater sugar daddy or pressure to conform than that. Next impotent lamestream agrument?

By: Joe

Joe — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:26:26 +0000

Climatologists get grants, i.e, $$$$$, “cha ching, cha ching.” Meteorologists don’t. Hell, if you are paid to look for agreement with an alleged fraudulent study that is your livelihood, puts food on your table, sells books, pays your bills, makes you a profit, so be it and go for it. (Not that it is fact, facts simply no longer matter) Money, called Grants, speak don’t they? Again, cha ching, cha ching……..

The general public is finally seeing through their antics and Mr. Mann can probably retire in good financial order and I assume with a “hockey stick” in hand? Finally, asking a lay person such as you as well as I for facts is like asking a plumber to fix the power grid. Good hunting for other suckers that buy your sweet drink to attempt to clear your dry throat later when you, as others are found incorrect.

Had to check in to see how the banter was going and I note that nothing has changed.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:32:50 +0000

Weather is not climate and climate is not weather. A meteorologist is looking at daily and weekly trends and is also looking at the fact that winter storms have been worse over the past few years. They can’t square that with what is still understood by many to be global warming when in reality, climate change is showing itself as a phenomenon of greater weather extremes of all sorts. Climatologists are looking at patterns that have developed over millennia. The two disciplines are related on the surface but they are two very different fields of study.

Asking a meteorologist for good information about climate change would be somewhat akin to asking a personal trainer for cancer treatment.

By: Darren N. Hood

Darren N. Hood — Sat, 07 Jul 2012 23:00:06 +0000

“U.S. Geological Survey scientists call the 600-mile (965-kilometer) swath a “hot spot” for climbing sea levels caused by global warming.”

The whole story is bunk, as NEILIO alludes too. The average sea level can not be rising in one location (the so called “hot spot”), and not rising in other locations of the same sea and connected seas. What is happening in the 600-mile swath is the land is sinking. Or, far less likely, the land everywhere but in the 600-mile swath is rising.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:57:21 +0000

Ok- how about this? More snarkiness from the snarkiness twins…? There, I did it! And what I did before was a short-hand version of the same thing. Boy, this is tough, being perfect and all that. I guess I’m just dull and pretty darn lazy, which is normal though for a Lefty. But I know if I work hard I may someday actually be worthy to pollute these pristine and superior web pages. That day is certianly a long way off for me, but my teachers and mentors here will help and guide me, that much I am sure of.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:51:53 +0000

Wow you do know everything and are some kind of savant. What kind I kindly won’t say. And as usual it is I who is guilty, not thee. Must be nice.

By: NEILIO

NEILIO — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 11:59:38 +0000

I think you better check the definition of snark. First of all “snark” is a blend of snake and shark by Lewis Carroll, it is a synonym for “snore” or “snort.”. What you mean is “snarky” which is -Rudely sarcastic or disrespectful.- Which more accurately describes your comments actually.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:07:27 +0000

More snark from the snark twins. Tag team o’snark.

By: Joe

Joe — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 05:53:17 +0000

I’m on the “payroll” for free. You get what you pay for. As to this article? Pure bunk.

By: NEILIO

NEILIO — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:45:36 +0000

That’s hardly commenting on the story.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:49:41 +0000

I’ve done a lot of sharing with you and everyone else on this site. As to your impertinence and arrogance, it does appear to be bit greater than normal lately, perhaps Dan finally put you on the payroll?

By: NEILIO

NEILIO — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:00:57 +0000

So, do you have any more insults for Mulkin or Monkton? Or just for me? Cuz I’d like to stay on the article posted if it’s not to much trouble. What do you think about sea levels? Aren’t you curious, like I am, as to why there are some places the level is up, and other places the level is down? What do you think of the story above? Do you see it as a story that’s meant to warn people of possible dangers, or as a story designed to scare you? I think it is fearmongering to push an aganda. What do you think? Or do you think I’m too impertinent and arrogant to share that with me?

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:56:21 +0000

Nevermind, I know, you don’t get hypocrisy. It’s a mental block of some sort. I think if you ever do get it your head will explode.