Comments on: Al’s Latest Global-Warming Whopper

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:15:25 +0000

Dan, Sorry if I get cranked up and surely when confronted. I don’t like to back down. Sorry for the inconvenience that I may have caused.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:50:31 +0000

Sorry Robbie Boy we learn nothing new from you other than Al Gore’s worn out BS that you constantly copy and paste. Do you ever have a thought? You are a waste of time.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:58:43 +0000

I guess Bush NEVER used a teleprompter, and even wrote all of his speeches hisself!! Golly gee, I miss that misunderestimated genius. He did such a good job running this country… into the ground.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:56:49 +0000

You guys need to get a life.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:55:33 +0000

Yes, be afraid of and avoid those different than you. Golly gee you just might learn something! Not Hope, just Nope.

Keep up the closed mind-set and mutual stroking. That’ll help change the world… not.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:51:57 +0000

Oh boo hoo. Being in the military qualifies you for some special status of knowledge? Really? Grandiose/Narcissism anyone?

The military is not socialist in nature? Is that what you are avoiding debating? Neil- you really need to back up and look at things from a clearer perspective. You and others seem to automatically disagree without any real thought. If you cannot see that this statement is technically true, then it is you, I’m afraid, who has no clue.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:47:33 +0000

But you don’t operate the same way? Are you somehow super-human and think totally objectively? What if your “skills” are not what you think they are? What if you are very subjective, so much so that you cannot even detect it, even if you tried…? Although I think you could try harder.

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:11:17 +0000

I wonder what Susan S. Pastin thinks of you using her material?

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:09:58 +0000

Do you have any original thoughts Rob? Or do you just repeat what idiots say all the time?
http://blog.buzzflash.com/contributors/3040

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:01:23 +0000

The “reality” you claim to know about is your subjective reality. It is not objective reality. Your trouble is that you believe your subjective reality IS objective reality, which is why you just will not let it go. Why is it so important to you that we adopt your subjective reality?

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:04:04 +0000

Maybe you took my reply as antagonistic. It was not meant to be. I agree with you Tony, and hope to see you post some more.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:10:45 +0000

Thanks Dan.

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:48:38 +0000

Whatever the case, thanks just the same.

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:42:31 +0000

Thanks Dan!

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:56:11 +0000

Update: It’s 48 stations that report a decline. 190 report an increase. I’m not a math guy so I don’t know which numbers are the right ones, but the 48 stations reporting decline totals over the last 100 years are -62 ft. Divided by 48 that is -1.3 ft/100 years. The 190 stations report a rise of 136 ft divided by 190 that is 0.72/100 years. But if I put all of the stations together it is 74.7 ft/238=3.2 ft/100 years. Which is about 0.032 ft/year worldwide. Which still does not sound like a crisis to me especially considering the fact that at the height of the last glacial period the sea levels were about 333 ft lower than they are today.