Comments on: Rajendra Pachauri to defend handling of IPCC after climate change science row

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:36:19 +0000

Lynn Cheney once wrote a very racy novel. So what?

By: Paul Wenum

Paul Wenum — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:24:58 +0000

The IPCC is re-thinking! A New report will definitely follow. Trust me. Never ends does it.

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:42:13 +0000

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7111068/Revealed-the-racy-novel-written-by-the-worlds-most-powerful-climate-scientist.html

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:04:46 +0000

Porn novel?

By: Dan McGrath

Dan McGrath — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:47:08 +0000

Interesting. You got it.

By: Lone Wolf

Lone Wolf — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:04:30 +0000

http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/42323/545720.html
Could anyone offer comment on the above article? I was amazed as I read it. It makes perfect sense to me. Why haven’t we heard this before?
Dan, maybe you could post the article here to draw more attention to it.

By: Is the blogosphere replacing the increasingly discredited MSM? « TWAWKI

Is the blogosphere replacing the increasingly discredited MSM? « TWAWKI — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:01:47 +0000

[...] Hamilton – one way to turn people off the ABC, UN IPCC hypocrisy continues, Hypocritical Pachauri day of reckoning looms large, Is the internet dividing America?, Pachauri waste deep in sh*t, Carbon legislation [...]

By: Cubanshamoo

Cubanshamoo — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:27:53 +0000

All déjà vu: even without any kind of scientific evidence, the global warming hoax is assumed to be true unless proved false beyong any possible doubt. In contrast, the serious work of many other climatologists against the warming hypothesis is assumed to be false unless evidence is completely unassailable in its support. Send more troops we are winning!!!

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:56:28 +0000

As stated, it will continue. Too much invested. Trust me. We will eventually all pay unless there is a change in the administration and mind-set. T-Paw being one of them and I’m a republican/conservative! I’m so tired of retreads always putting their fingers in the wind that it makes my sick be it dem or repub!!! Does anyone ever state their actual thoughts anymore? Damn it is frustrating being a Democrat, Republican or independent. That is a sad state to be in. No wonder America has a major problem.

By: Hal Groar

Hal Groar — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:54:18 +0000

How does a guy get a job like that? You get re-hired for copying other peoples “facts” and passing them off as scientific truth, only to be busted. Even going as far as ridiculing the very people who have the real facts. Only in the U.N. can that pass for a job well done. Does anyone take them seriously anymore?

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:53:09 +0000

They call them errors? No, an error is when you add 2+2 and get 5. That’s an error. I think they should be called what they are. Hmm… let’s see, we could call them prevarications. We could call them falsehoods, untruths, or falsities too. Fibs, tales, or taradiddles might work as well. But what they really are are whoppers, and wallopers. Which according to the dictionary means a gross untruth; a blatant lie.
But of course that would only support what I, and other like minded AGW deniers, have been saying from the git go.

By: klem

klem — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:09:25 +0000

I can hardly wait for him to get up there in front of all of those reporters, and bomb. He might even get up there and promote his new porn novel. No matter what he says he has no credibility anymore. He should step down, but I’m hoping he stays because the person who replaces him might actually be good. The skeptics need this guy to stay as the head of the UN IPCC to ensure it’s total failure.