Comments on: Blizzards Heat Up Warming Debate

By: Paul Wenum

Paul Wenum — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:32:18 +0000

The “Toilet” you state is ready to be “flushed” by the left. Let’s hope that they cannot push the handle.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:05:44 +0000

You are exaggerating again Paul. Obama is doing what his financial advisors have told him to do, which is basically the continuation of what Bush started. Not to mention that it may indeed have saved us from a real Depression. Any republican president wouldn’t have done anything different. That said- I don’t agree with much of it either but to demonize one party and one man (or two- I know I can’t leave out the evil A.G.!) is ridiculous. And you need to wake up and realize that. Otherwise we will all continue to go down the toilet.

By: Cubanshamoo

Cubanshamoo — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:18:06 +0000

Sorry for my stupidity concerning the Nuclear Option. I have no idea of the real meaning. Sorry!

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:06:38 +0000

President Bush was not a conservative like I am and was chastised for it by me as well as others. Spent our money/your money like it grew on trees. That said, President Obama has tripled/quadrupled the expense. As to nuclear power, he can say all he wants but let’s see if he has the cahunna’s to actually start to build nuclear power plants such as France etc. I sincerely doubt it. The powers of the environmentalists will prevail. They have since the 70′s. Research it!!!

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 15:00:27 +0000

Really Paul, you know that, huh? Wow. “His” EPA standards are not much different from Bush’s. If Obama is as Liberal as you believe (falsely so) then why oh why would he continue to piss of his Liberal supporters like this for example, which is only one example among MANY. Makes absolutely no sense unless he means to support nuclear energy.

Oh that’s right, you just respond robotically. Where do you get YOUR talking points from?

By: Paul Wenum

Paul Wenum — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:59:55 +0000

For Cuba’s sake he lives in Europe. They don’t know what reconciliation (Nuclear option) is. By the way Obama’s 8 Billion for nuclear? Let it pass HIS EPA standards. Yeah right! His statement was nothing but “Showtime.”!

By: Dan

Dan — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:38:22 +0000

By “nuclear option,” they are discussing a political procedure in the Senate that prevents a filibuster. In this case, it’s a way to cheat the accepted process and would be a violation of Senate rules. Still, nuclear power is a good option.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:24:31 +0000

Uhhh, I rest my case…

By: Cubanshamoo

Cubanshamoo — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:58:18 +0000

Paul, I don’t see Nuclear option as a bad one. It could be safe, clean and economic. There are oil pumps between Alaska and USA (crossing the entire Canada) that operates alone (automatically) and should be charged only every 10 years. That is an important source of energy.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:49:08 +0000

It has been predicted and it will come true. Unfortunately, we will all pay for this option that I sincerely believe will be taken. Heaven help my children in the years to come. As for you, Robbie Boy, you are what you are and will never change. Time will tell if you are the wonder that you think you are.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:53:57 +0000

Now the “nuclear option” is a bad thing…? A couple years ago it was a good thing, wasn’t it? Ahhh, the good (bad) ol’ days…

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:52:49 +0000

Gotcha. 100% is nazi-like fascism or totalitarianism. Fits you guys like a glove, it does.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:00:49 +0000

By the way, they will be pushing the nuclear option on health care very shortly, now watch out for cap N trade. As stated, it is definitely coming. Make sure that when it comes you call your representative. Always thinks worst case scenario and work back.

By: Hal Groar

Hal Groar — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:24:37 +0000

I am on board for 100%!

By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD

Neil F. AGWD/BSD — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:20:45 +0000

I don’t know. I think they are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. They are proceeding as if the AGW theory was as sound as ever. They have their fingers in their ears going la la la la la la!
What? Climategate? Uh, uh, hmmm, this doesn’t undermine the theory that climate change is caused by man. No, not at all. You can’t make something out of what a few scientists were saying to each other, it’s all meaningless. Jail the hacker!!!!!!!
Paul, they have lost but they just won’t face it.