<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientists Using Selective Temperature Data, Skeptics Say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say/comment-page-1/#comment-7115</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1105#comment-7115</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s meant to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s meant to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIck Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say/comment-page-1/#comment-7081</link>
		<dc:creator>MIck Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1105#comment-7081</guid>
		<description>Come  on  here  and think abit, our  two neighbouring planets dont have  water let alone  polar ice caps,  so  this  means  what ? well we  must  still be   coming out  of an ice age so yes  the  planet  will heat  up  but not  for  along   time, we&#039;re actually  doing more  harm by  daming  her  rivers,   imagine  that  the  rivers are like our veins-  they cool  us  and keep  us  going, blocking/daming then causes  bad  health  and death.  Right  or  Wrong??? Our  desire  to  build highways, sky scrapers etc all reflecting heat  back into    our   atomsphere  is doing  what  again thats right heating the planet unnaturally,  but  even with these added   and  vastly  underlooked  threats why     tax  us  and  make the inviduals  pay when  its  them  causing it.   Yes the  planets  getting warmer but  she&#039;s meant to be????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come  on  here  and think abit, our  two neighbouring planets dont have  water let alone  polar ice caps,  so  this  means  what ? well we  must  still be   coming out  of an ice age so yes  the  planet  will heat  up  but not  for  along   time, we&#8217;re actually  doing more  harm by  daming  her  rivers,   imagine  that  the  rivers are like our veins-  they cool  us  and keep  us  going, blocking/daming then causes  bad  health  and death.  Right  or  Wrong??? Our  desire  to  build highways, sky scrapers etc all reflecting heat  back into    our   atomsphere  is doing  what  again thats right heating the planet unnaturally,  but  even with these added   and  vastly  underlooked  threats why     tax  us  and  make the inviduals  pay when  its  them  causing it.   Yes the  planets  getting warmer but  she&#8217;s meant to be????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say/comment-page-1/#comment-7043</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1105#comment-7043</guid>
		<description>Agree.  Read the same thing.  Bulk on the &quot;hottest on record.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.  Read the same thing.  Bulk on the &#8220;hottest on record.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/scientists-using-selective-temperature-data-skeptics-say/comment-page-1/#comment-7038</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F. AGWD/BSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1105#comment-7038</guid>
		<description>Dan, thanks for this. I was about to start scouring the web for information about the claim that 2000-2009 was the hottest decade on record, when I saw this article right here. I may have a bit of a confirmation bias here, but this is the exact type of thing I suspected was going on. 
AGW was a lie, and it still is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, thanks for this. I was about to start scouring the web for information about the claim that 2000-2009 was the hottest decade on record, when I saw this article right here. I may have a bit of a confirmation bias here, but this is the exact type of thing I suspected was going on.<br />
AGW was a lie, and it still is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

