<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Research Finds No Increase in CO2 in Past 150 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>As stated, time will tell as it always does.  Actions speaks bs weeps.  What will it be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, time will tell as it always does.  Actions speaks bs weeps.  What will it be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-7142</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-7142</guid>
		<description>You wise-est words yet my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wise-est words yet my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-7099</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-7099</guid>
		<description>Time will tell my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time will tell my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-7009</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not worried- Obama isn&#039;t half the fascist Bush/Cheney was/is.  Not yet anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not worried- Obama isn&#8217;t half the fascist Bush/Cheney was/is.  Not yet anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6866</guid>
		<description>I think Obama&#039;s guys want to stop you posting such theories. Be careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama&#8217;s guys want to stop you posting such theories. Be careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6859</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6859</guid>
		<description>Since you didn&#039;t anwser, I will go ahead myself, as usual, eh?

I think by design or not (although the Repubs are truly guilty of this, by design) there has been a concerted attack on science especially starting wtih Bush Jr. or Shrub as we like to call him.  Maybe it will turn out to be a good thing, maybe science needed a wake up call to keep them honest.  I doubt this because there are many honest scientists out there still.  Money has corrupted science, but not for a Liberal bias, but the opposite.  but those that have been attacking it have gone too far, of course, and now just about everyone, myself included, barely believes anything any more.  It is a very strange place for supposedly modern intelligent humans to be in.  I dearly hope we get thru this period relatively unscathed.  This worries me a lot however because there is real science out there that is being either ignored or drowned out with bad science.  We can&#039;t exist very long (at least in a healthy way) in this mess we are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you didn&#8217;t anwser, I will go ahead myself, as usual, eh?</p>
<p>I think by design or not (although the Repubs are truly guilty of this, by design) there has been a concerted attack on science especially starting wtih Bush Jr. or Shrub as we like to call him.  Maybe it will turn out to be a good thing, maybe science needed a wake up call to keep them honest.  I doubt this because there are many honest scientists out there still.  Money has corrupted science, but not for a Liberal bias, but the opposite.  but those that have been attacking it have gone too far, of course, and now just about everyone, myself included, barely believes anything any more.  It is a very strange place for supposedly modern intelligent humans to be in.  I dearly hope we get thru this period relatively unscathed.  This worries me a lot however because there is real science out there that is being either ignored or drowned out with bad science.  We can&#8217;t exist very long (at least in a healthy way) in this mess we are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6840</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6840</guid>
		<description>If you say so.  What do you think about my thesis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you say so.  What do you think about my thesis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6824</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6824</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Not to mention the magnitude of data in support of climate change.&lt;/blockquote&gt;



There isn&#039;t really that much original data/research to support global warming. There&#039;s Mann et-al&#039;s work on constructing the (now debunked) &quot;hockey-stick chart,&quot; some (fudged, inaccurate) climate modelling software, and a whole bunch of studies that just rehash and repackage previous work. There&#039;s a lot written about these few things but very little original data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Not to mention the magnitude of data in support of climate change.</p></blockquote>
<p>There isn&#8217;t really that much original data/research to support global warming. There&#8217;s Mann et-al&#8217;s work on constructing the (now debunked) &#8220;hockey-stick chart,&#8221; some (fudged, inaccurate) climate modelling software, and a whole bunch of studies that just rehash and repackage previous work. There&#8217;s a lot written about these few things but very little original data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6820</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6820</guid>
		<description>Dan, I find it incredibly difficult to believe that virtually ALL of the major public figures across the globe, all of whom have a lot to lose from such a big scandal as this would/could be, if in fact they turn out to be wrong- are more or less out-spoken in their belief that climate change IS a dire issue.  Of course there are also many (not as many) major public figures who for their own reasons have come out publically against it.  Not to mention the magnitude of data in support of climate change.  So- THIS in the face of GLOBAL COOLING????   Really??????    It&#039;s one thing to be wrong about something, but to be COMPLETELY WRONG IN AN OPPOSITE WAY ???????   Won&#039;t they look stupid eh?    Very stupid indeed.

How about this for a conspriacy theory? (Disclaimer: my own, I just made it up) -   All these elitist Leftys (mostly) created a false doctrine (global warming) so as to make people around the globe become VERY dubious if not out-right skeptical of ANY further major (or minor) claims made by the scientific community, once the truth makes itself known (it will either get arming, cooler or stay the same).  Why would they go to all that trouble and risk their own reputations like that?  They only thing I can think of is this:  So They (and their private worker bees) can control and manipulate the flow of information to us peons because no one will believe the&quot;experts&quot;.  This is, of course, already occurring; but bits and pieces of real and raw data still slip thru to the huddled and dirty masses.  Not a bad conspriacy theory if I do say so myself...!  Any one have a better one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, I find it incredibly difficult to believe that virtually ALL of the major public figures across the globe, all of whom have a lot to lose from such a big scandal as this would/could be, if in fact they turn out to be wrong- are more or less out-spoken in their belief that climate change IS a dire issue.  Of course there are also many (not as many) major public figures who for their own reasons have come out publically against it.  Not to mention the magnitude of data in support of climate change.  So- THIS in the face of GLOBAL COOLING????   Really??????    It&#8217;s one thing to be wrong about something, but to be COMPLETELY WRONG IN AN OPPOSITE WAY ???????   Won&#8217;t they look stupid eh?    Very stupid indeed.</p>
<p>How about this for a conspriacy theory? (Disclaimer: my own, I just made it up) &#8211;   All these elitist Leftys (mostly) created a false doctrine (global warming) so as to make people around the globe become VERY dubious if not out-right skeptical of ANY further major (or minor) claims made by the scientific community, once the truth makes itself known (it will either get arming, cooler or stay the same).  Why would they go to all that trouble and risk their own reputations like that?  They only thing I can think of is this:  So They (and their private worker bees) can control and manipulate the flow of information to us peons because no one will believe the&#8221;experts&#8221;.  This is, of course, already occurring; but bits and pieces of real and raw data still slip thru to the huddled and dirty masses.  Not a bad conspriacy theory if I do say so myself&#8230;!  Any one have a better one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JH</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>JH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>Thank god someone has some sense. The arrogance of our world leaders is astounding. At Copenhagen didn&#039;t nObama sign something with several other countries saying that they are to attempt to keep the globe from warming 4-5 degrees F or C by 2050? Yea, good luck with that guys. Natural forces are not to be reckoned with. I guess they will build something that will keep volcanoes from erupting and put the red dusting all over natural forests to keep them from burning. Those two natural occurrences produce/emit a much more higher percentage of CO2 than humans ever will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god someone has some sense. The arrogance of our world leaders is astounding. At Copenhagen didn&#8217;t nObama sign something with several other countries saying that they are to attempt to keep the globe from warming 4-5 degrees F or C by 2050? Yea, good luck with that guys. Natural forces are not to be reckoned with. I guess they will build something that will keep volcanoes from erupting and put the red dusting all over natural forests to keep them from burning. Those two natural occurrences produce/emit a much more higher percentage of CO2 than humans ever will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6800</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6800</guid>
		<description>I posted an article that reports on a scientific paper&#039;s findings and the analysis on that paper done by a scientific journal. I think I&#039;ll give them a touch more weight in determining whether the assertions are valid than youself. 

You&#039;re new here, so I&#039;ll cut you some slack and allow you some time for everything to sink in. I know it&#039;s probably hard to accept new information that contradicts a decade or more of steady indoctrination. Let me help you piece this all together. The earth is not presently on a warming trend. It WAS. When it was, it was probably due to solar activity above all else. Nobody is saying the Earth is getting hotter because of clouds. The articles say that the most potent greenhouse gas is water vapor, accounting for something like 90% of the earth&#039;s ability to retain heat. It&#039;s insulation. 

Anthropogenic (man-caused) CO2 emissions have been on the rise for the past 60 years or so - this isn&#039;t in dispute, but it&#039;s still a tiny, tiny amount compared to natural forces and now it seems that the Earth is fully able to deal with the tiny rise in emissions. (note emissions and atmospheric proportions are not the same thing). 

The Earth is indeed cooling. It has been for years. By that, I mean average global temperatures. To summarize: man-made CO2 emissions are up. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are not. The earth was warming. Now it&#039;s cooling. This is natural, normal, and there&#039;s little, if anything we can do to alter he natural warming and cooling cycles of the Earth. I hope that helps put the articles in context. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted an article that reports on a scientific paper&#8217;s findings and the analysis on that paper done by a scientific journal. I think I&#8217;ll give them a touch more weight in determining whether the assertions are valid than youself. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re new here, so I&#8217;ll cut you some slack and allow you some time for everything to sink in. I know it&#8217;s probably hard to accept new information that contradicts a decade or more of steady indoctrination. Let me help you piece this all together. The earth is not presently on a warming trend. It WAS. When it was, it was probably due to solar activity above all else. Nobody is saying the Earth is getting hotter because of clouds. The articles say that the most potent greenhouse gas is water vapor, accounting for something like 90% of the earth&#8217;s ability to retain heat. It&#8217;s insulation. </p>
<p>Anthropogenic (man-caused) CO2 emissions have been on the rise for the past 60 years or so &#8211; this isn&#8217;t in dispute, but it&#8217;s still a tiny, tiny amount compared to natural forces and now it seems that the Earth is fully able to deal with the tiny rise in emissions. (note emissions and atmospheric proportions are not the same thing). </p>
<p>The Earth is indeed cooling. It has been for years. By that, I mean average global temperatures. To summarize: man-made CO2 emissions are up. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are not. The earth was warming. Now it&#8217;s cooling. This is natural, normal, and there&#8217;s little, if anything we can do to alter he natural warming and cooling cycles of the Earth. I hope that helps put the articles in context. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cubanshamoo</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>Cubanshamoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>Mariza, I like your style, but I see nothing horrible in reading different claims on CO2 emitions. I would be more interesting in knowing why &quot;human&quot; CO2&quot; hasn&#039;t increased in a post industrial revolution period. Then, knowing that all &quot;human CO2&quot; can be absorved by the sea in just 23 days, I wonder why so many people dedicate such importance to this wonderful gas? Or even better, why we believe we could change so easily the global climate? Humans are simply arrogant creatures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mariza, I like your style, but I see nothing horrible in reading different claims on CO2 emitions. I would be more interesting in knowing why &#8220;human&#8221; CO2&#8243; hasn&#8217;t increased in a post industrial revolution period. Then, knowing that all &#8220;human CO2&#8243; can be absorved by the sea in just 23 days, I wonder why so many people dedicate such importance to this wonderful gas? Or even better, why we believe we could change so easily the global climate? Humans are simply arrogant creatures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariza Costa-Cabral</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariza Costa-Cabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6782</guid>
		<description>You won&#039;t remove your article that falsely asserts that CO2 has not been rising, and you still want me to engage in discussion? Is &quot;discussion&quot; what you use for &quot;smoke and mirrors&quot;, so we won&#039;t notice that this totally fraudulent article remains online?

What a joke! CO2 has not been increasing, you say!  How can anybody write that?????  Mauna Loa&#039;s CO2 measurements are determined by its own volcanic emissions!  Wow!!!!!  These are astounding and incredibly ridiculous statements!  Ignorance of a magnitude never previously seen!  

One article on this web site claims the earth is cooling.  The next article claims it&#039;s warming because of clouds.  One says CO2 isn&#039;t increasing (an amazing statement).  Another says CO2 is increasing but that doesn&#039;t affect the climate.

Wow! Wow! Wow! What a way to spend your time on this earth!  Go take that article down, Dan.  Be a man, for heavens sake!  Take down the lies, write about what is true.  Shave, take a shower, breathe the air, start a new and honest life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You won&#8217;t remove your article that falsely asserts that CO2 has not been rising, and you still want me to engage in discussion? Is &#8220;discussion&#8221; what you use for &#8220;smoke and mirrors&#8221;, so we won&#8217;t notice that this totally fraudulent article remains online?</p>
<p>What a joke! CO2 has not been increasing, you say!  How can anybody write that?????  Mauna Loa&#8217;s CO2 measurements are determined by its own volcanic emissions!  Wow!!!!!  These are astounding and incredibly ridiculous statements!  Ignorance of a magnitude never previously seen!  </p>
<p>One article on this web site claims the earth is cooling.  The next article claims it&#8217;s warming because of clouds.  One says CO2 isn&#8217;t increasing (an amazing statement).  Another says CO2 is increasing but that doesn&#8217;t affect the climate.</p>
<p>Wow! Wow! Wow! What a way to spend your time on this earth!  Go take that article down, Dan.  Be a man, for heavens sake!  Take down the lies, write about what is true.  Shave, take a shower, breathe the air, start a new and honest life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>You seem to have run out of useful things to contribute to the discussion. Come back later when you have something of substance to add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to have run out of useful things to contribute to the discussion. Come back later when you have something of substance to add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariza Costa-Cabral</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2010/01/new-research-finds-no-increase-in-co2-in-past-150-years/comment-page-1/#comment-6778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariza Costa-Cabral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1053#comment-6778</guid>
		<description>Dan:

You posted a lie (claiming that CO2 hasn&#039;t been rising) and have refused to remove your lie from the internet.

Please do so promptly.

Mariza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan:</p>
<p>You posted a lie (claiming that CO2 hasn&#8217;t been rising) and have refused to remove your lie from the internet.</p>
<p>Please do so promptly.</p>
<p>Mariza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

