Comments on: The New Climate Litigation http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/ Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:17:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: TESOL Certification http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-41970 TESOL Certification Sun, 25 Dec 2011 20:55:33 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-41970 I am waiting for some scientific explanation as to how an increase from 250 ppm CO2 to 400 ppm CO2 in our atmosphere can affect our climate. Is it possible that the temperature increases first releasing CO2 from the ocean? I am waiting for some scientific explanation as to how an increase from 250 ppm CO2 to 400 ppm CO2 in our atmosphere can affect our climate. Is it possible that the temperature increases first releasing CO2 from the ocean?

]]> By: Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6636 Rob N. Hood Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:50:10 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6636 Like the golden calf, eh? That is very sublime... subconscious even. Good post... especially for other like-minded barbarians. Like the golden calf, eh? That is very sublime… subconscious even. Good post… especially for other like-minded barbarians.

]]> By: ade http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6616 ade Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:32:15 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6616 The Greenpeas should be praising the utility companies If it were not for their CO2 production ,people would be freezing and dying due to the cold weather. They cannot have it both ways. CO2 is good for America,especially now. BRR The Greenpeas should be praising the utility companies
If it were not for their CO2 production ,people would be freezing and dying
due to the cold weather. They cannot have it both ways.
CO2 is good for America,especially now. BRR

]]> By: Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6510 Rob N. Hood Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:48:03 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6510 AllI was doing was pointing out the hypocrisy of the Right being ok with certain kinds of lawsuits but not another kind. That's all. Plus, I was simply making a statement about our justice system. I was not defending it or praising it. Brush up on your reading skills. And Paul, as usual you resort to hyperbole and nonsense. AllI was doing was pointing out the hypocrisy of the Right being ok with certain kinds of lawsuits but not another kind. That’s all. Plus, I was simply making a statement about our justice system. I was not defending it or praising it. Brush up on your reading skills. And Paul, as usual you resort to hyperbole and nonsense.

]]> By: Neil F. AGWD/BSD http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6509 Neil F. AGWD/BSD Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:17:28 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6509 (This is from previous post but I think it bares repeating) CO2 is 0.038% of Earth’s atmosphere. For those of you who don’t understand how small a number that is, you would have to multiply that by roughly 26.315 times to get to 1% of the Earth’s atmospheric composition. http://www.nov55.com/ntyg.html “Carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation (IR) in three narrow bands of wavelengths, which are 2.7, 4.3 and 15 micrometers (µM). This means that most of the heat producing radiation escapes it. About 8% of the available black body radiation is picked up by these “fingerprint” frequencies of CO2.” What that means is even if you were to double, tripple, or qaudruple the amount of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, it will still only pick up, or absorb, 8% of the infra-red radiation coming from the Earth’s surface. So please stop accepting this premise that CO2 is a pollutant, or “powerfull” greenhouse gas. It is a lie. (This is from previous post but I think it bares repeating)
CO2 is 0.038% of Earth’s atmosphere. For those of you who don’t understand how small a number that is, you would have to multiply that by roughly 26.315 times to get to 1% of the Earth’s atmospheric composition.

http://www.nov55.com/ntyg.html
“Carbon dioxide absorbs infrared radiation (IR) in three narrow bands of wavelengths, which are 2.7, 4.3 and 15 micrometers (µM). This means that most of the heat producing radiation escapes it. About 8% of the available black body radiation is picked up by these “fingerprint” frequencies of CO2.”

What that means is even if you were to double, tripple, or qaudruple the amount of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere, it will still only pick up, or absorb, 8% of the infra-red radiation coming from the Earth’s surface.
So please stop accepting this premise that CO2 is a pollutant, or “powerfull” greenhouse gas. It is a lie.

]]> By: Balgorg http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6493 Balgorg Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:47:47 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6493 Interesting artical you cite, anyone here a member of the AGU ? because thats where the actual figures have been published. Interesting artical you cite, anyone here a member of the AGU ? because thats where the actual figures have been published.

]]> By: Hal Groar http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6489 Hal Groar Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:18:24 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6489 Here is something interesting...http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091230184221.htm This throws a wrench into the EPA regulations. Tough to regulate CO2 when it hasn't risen in the last 160 years. Hmmm.... Here is something interesting…http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091230184221.htm

This throws a wrench into the EPA regulations. Tough to regulate CO2 when it hasn’t risen in the last 160 years. Hmmm….

]]> By: Hal Groar http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6487 Hal Groar Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:51:11 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6487 Rob, I guess if you work hard and earn a good living your entitled to a sharp lawyer. Granted you pay for it, but you EARNED it. That is the American way and I am proud of it. My children aspire to be rich some day, do they need to be reprogrammed to accept squalor? They certainly won't inherit millions, so they will need to earn it. Will they be bad people if they earn it themselves? How much money does one person need in your world? Is over $25,000 a year taking too much money out of the treasury pie? Class envy is ugly. Easy to spot though. Rob, I guess if you work hard and earn a good living your entitled to a sharp lawyer. Granted you pay for it, but you EARNED it. That is the American way and I am proud of it. My children aspire to be rich some day, do they need to be reprogrammed to accept squalor? They certainly won’t inherit millions, so they will need to earn it. Will they be bad people if they earn it themselves? How much money does one person need in your world? Is over $25,000 a year taking too much money out of the treasury pie? Class envy is ugly. Easy to spot though.

]]> By: Paul Wenum http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6466 Paul Wenum Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:07:16 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6466 The bottom line is "if you eat too many beans and fart you can be sued." Intimadation it is and always will be from the very "far left." I always wondered if someone expelled "natural gas" that they would be sued. My theory has now been proven correct. What is this world coming to? You tell me. The bottom line is “if you eat too many beans and fart you can be sued.” Intimadation it is and always will be from the very “far left.” I always wondered if someone expelled “natural gas” that they would be sued. My theory has now been proven correct. What is this world coming to? You tell me.

]]> By: Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/the-new-climate-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-6461 Rob N. Hood Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:41:00 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1048#comment-6461 This doesn't seem that different from the right-wingers who sue the government to be able to use public land for their purposes, or when the government restricts something that they've been doing for years and get crazy angry about it and sue. I don't believe many if any of these lawsuits will actually win. Contrary to popular gossip, not many "frivolous" lawsuits prevail. If there really is a legitimate greivance, and a judge/jury awards damages, well that is the American way, is it not? That is called Justice. Now you may not agree with a certain outcome but my friends (and enemies) that is JUSTICE as currently practiced in this country. It is not a bad method actually and historically has been copied by many around the world. The only real problem with it is the one with the most money in the first place usually wins. Money sometimes does "buy" justice, either through out-right bribery, or other methods like how OJ was able to purchase the best defense money could buy, and it worked for him, at least the first time... But that is perhaps a bad example, because large corporations employ and retain MANY very expensive attorneys to work the system for them on a constant basis. But that is getting back to the main problem with this country... This doesn’t seem that different from the right-wingers who sue the government to be able to use public land for their purposes, or when the government restricts something that they’ve been doing for years and get crazy angry about it and sue. I don’t believe many if any of these lawsuits will actually win. Contrary to popular gossip, not many “frivolous” lawsuits prevail. If there really is a legitimate greivance, and a judge/jury awards damages, well that is the American way, is it not? That is called Justice. Now you may not agree with a certain outcome but my friends (and enemies) that is JUSTICE as currently practiced in this country. It is not a bad method actually and historically has been copied by many around the world. The only real problem with it is the one with the most money in the first place usually wins. Money sometimes does “buy” justice, either through out-right bribery, or other methods like how OJ was able to purchase the best defense money could buy, and it worked for him, at least the first time… But that is perhaps a bad example, because large corporations employ and retain MANY very expensive attorneys to work the system for them on a constant basis. But that is getting back to the main problem with this country…

]]>