Comments on: Study suggests CFCs, cosmic rays (not CO2) are major culprits for global warming http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/study-shows-cfcs-cosmic-rays-major-culprits-for-global-warming/ Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:24:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/study-shows-cfcs-cosmic-rays-major-culprits-for-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-6620 Rob N. Hood Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:57:47 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1026#comment-6620 I forgot to add the Freeon (spelling?) issue. Some people got real angry about having to pay more for the stuff in their air conditioners. But it was necessary to reduce the ozone holes too. And if you don't recall, that particular ozone layer is Crucial to all life on this planet and that is why the change (relatively easy overall) was made without much arguing and debating, unlike the current issue has been. Many on the Right tried to make hay out of it as usual, but due to the dire nature of the problem and the relatively easy remedy, the political machinations of the Right didn't have much effect, except for the extreme Right as usual. I forgot to add the Freeon (spelling?) issue. Some people got real angry about having to pay more for the stuff in their air conditioners. But it was necessary to reduce the ozone holes too. And if you don’t recall, that particular ozone layer is Crucial to all life on this planet and that is why the change (relatively easy overall) was made without much arguing and debating, unlike the current issue has been. Many on the Right tried to make hay out of it as usual, but due to the dire nature of the problem and the relatively easy remedy, the political machinations of the Right didn’t have much effect, except for the extreme Right as usual.

]]> By: Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/study-shows-cfcs-cosmic-rays-major-culprits-for-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-6533 Rob N. Hood Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:32:47 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1026#comment-6533 I have to say I believe that issue (Ozone holes over the poles) is basically agreed upon universally, and the reduction of Areosol use has made a difference. Now- with that in mind, IF there were another big change in the "holes" that would be studied and the particular agreement re: areosols would then be re-evaluated obviously. There are different types of ozone and I think you are referring to something different. To so cavalierly dismiss science, as you tend to do, is disingenuous and even dishonest. I have to say I believe that issue (Ozone holes over the poles) is basically agreed upon universally, and the reduction of Areosol use has made a difference. Now- with that in mind, IF there were another big change in the “holes” that would be studied and the particular agreement re: areosols would then be re-evaluated obviously. There are different types of ozone and I think you are referring to something different. To so cavalierly dismiss science, as you tend to do, is disingenuous and even dishonest.

]]> By: Dan http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/study-shows-cfcs-cosmic-rays-major-culprits-for-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-6453 Dan Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:21:25 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1026#comment-6453 Whether CFCs had anything to do with changes in the Ozone layer is and was disputed science. It's known that radiation from the sun interacting with the Earth's atmosphere creates Ozone. We now know that the ozone "hole" comes and goes. It's also located above the poles where the sun's influence on the atmosphere is weak because of the angle, which is also why it's cold there. Whether CFCs had anything to do with changes in the Ozone layer is and was disputed science. It’s known that radiation from the sun interacting with the Earth’s atmosphere creates Ozone. We now know that the ozone “hole” comes and goes. It’s also located above the poles where the sun’s influence on the atmosphere is weak because of the angle, which is also why it’s cold there.

]]> By: Rob N. Hood http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/study-shows-cfcs-cosmic-rays-major-culprits-for-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-6451 Rob N. Hood Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:44:08 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1026#comment-6451 This is interesting. But the article also states that "CFC's conspiring with cosmic rays most likely caused the Antarctic ozone hole and global warming." And it adds that this is was "unexpected." First of all, the ozone problem was/is well known, and has been for many years. We were even able to do something about it, almost if not globally (reduce and eliminate CFC's). It is interesting that we haven'theard much about the ozone hole/s other than they were getting smaller gradually, but that the CFC's were still present in the atmosphere and causing the same problem, but by reducing the production of them on earth the problem is controlled... This does illustrate that serious problems can be handled globally. And if this article is true then there is much reason for optimism. It also has an element of logic that makes it seem potentially accurate to a laymen such as I. However, an issue such as global warming/cooling is a very complex one. This is interesting. But the article also states that “CFC’s conspiring with cosmic rays most likely caused the Antarctic ozone hole and global warming.” And it adds that this is was “unexpected.” First of all, the ozone problem was/is well known, and has been for many years. We were even able to do something about it, almost if not globally (reduce and eliminate CFC’s). It is interesting that we haven’theard much about the ozone hole/s other than they were getting smaller gradually, but that the CFC’s were still present in the atmosphere and causing the same problem, but by reducing the production of them on earth the problem is controlled…

This does illustrate that serious problems can be handled globally. And if this article is true then there is much reason for optimism. It also has an element of logic that makes it seem potentially accurate to a laymen such as I. However, an issue such as global warming/cooling is a very complex one.

]]> By: Paul Wenum http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/12/study-shows-cfcs-cosmic-rays-major-culprits-for-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-6423 Paul Wenum Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:23:57 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=1026#comment-6423 Why doesn't the media report findings such as this as well as the previous post? The Media must get excellent revenue from pro-climate scam "experts." Never changes does it. Why doesn’t the media report findings such as this as well as the previous post? The Media must get excellent revenue from pro-climate scam “experts.” Never changes does it.

]]>