Comments on: Just Wow

By: Neptune

Neptune — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:59:58 +0000

What a joke. This was bad Hollywood promoting lies

By: Dan McGrath

Dan McGrath — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:26:22 +0000

Well, Kennedy was no Barry Goldwater, but compared to the Democrats of today, he was very conservative.

By: Paul Wenum

Paul Wenum — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:31:41 +0000

Rob, If you look at his policies, and I mean LOOK, JFK was a “repub” you call them now. Lower taxes etc. My mother-in-law still has a picture of him in her living room. My father voted for him!

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:16:33 +0000

It’s a sore spot for me- because Kennedy was obviously trying to do some things the power elite just would not allow. That is- dismantle the Federal Reserve and end the war in Vietnam, he was even foolish/brave enough to try and go up against the CIA. He did these things for the benefit of the People not the Elite. They sent him, and all of us, a very powerful message that horrible day in Dallas. To some extent, maybe a great extent, the America we all think of and long for died that day as well. It, and we, have never recovered, and I’m afraid the America I learned about in grade school will never exist again. The Fed reigns supreme, it enslaves us all actually. JFK, and others, knew that then and wanted to free us from it.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:02:15 +0000

Typical left wing Alinski liberal. You don’t read other than the script given you. All I said, IF you read, which I doubt, is that the Media has changed our system as to how officials are elected. Who gives you your talking points? Curious I am.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:48:54 +0000

OMG- you actually think Nixon was a more legitimate President than Kennedy? Even after what happened to paranoid old racist Nixon after you conservatoids voted for him again and again until he finally won it? He shit all over everyone in America- including you. You are sick, you need help.

By: jpw

jpw — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:04:54 +0000

http://www.prisonplanet.com/arctic-ice-grows-30-per-cent-in-a-year.html The fraud of global warming being due primarily to humans continues.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:21:32 +0000

No, we, the people will vote our conscience in 2010/12 and before we vote we will think hard about who we will vote for for the first time since the Kennedy Nixon TV debate that defined all future elections. In today’s world, it is not about the values, leadership, qualities, wisdom experience, it is all about looks, sound bites, not saying what you mean and telling everyone what they want to hear and then doing likewise when elected. Those days I hope are finally over. If a viable third party candidate should appear, conservatives may well follow. It all comes down to who, with values we all cherish has the internal fortitude to run. Any good candidates available? Enough pontificating.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:28:35 +0000

Yes, the polls are that way because Obama sucks, that’s what’s wrong (being serious)! He’s one of “them” apparently, and not doing much if anything to help the middle class of this country which is why we Liberals voted for him. And he/they fooled many of us for the last time too. That is (unless he makes a 180 degree change in the next 3 years), why many Dems, myself included, will not vote for the corporate Dem/Repub crooks any more. And you, “Red-State” sheeple will run to the polls and vote in your favorite fascists and will WIN big. That will sovle everything, eh? Then we will have another GW/Reagan clone who will (Palin?!) continue the rip off of the middle class, and leave another big mess/deficit for a Dem to have to clean up somehow, like Clinton did, or not like Obama is doing so far- he’s feeding the elite, just like the Repubs always did. Time to wake up folks. We need a mulit-party instant run-off system, NOT bought and paid for by the wealthy elite.

(How conveniently you guys forget how low GW’s polls were- must be nice in your own private la la land)

By: Lance

Lance — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:25:02 +0000

You remind me of a mosquito. Just wont shut the f*** up and leave rob alone. Ever hear of freedom of speech?

By: cass

cass — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:05:38 +0000

This is shameful but not surprising, the population get fed this rubbish and regretfully there are plenty who will buy into it.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:02:19 +0000

Why are the polls at 44% for Bush V Obama 1t 50? Is there a problem here?

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:16:01 +0000

It was just a valid example, Paul. Legitimate and on topic. You want me to Obama bash for awhile? I could do that too, would that make you happy? Get some sleep, or another hobby besides this one.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:08:37 +0000

Rob goes back to Bush bashing. You remind me of “Groundhog Days.” It is always the same. Typical when you have nothing to refute the argument other than baffle them with your BS..

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:45:10 +0000

It’s true that the e-mails reveal CRU climate scientists were dismissive of skeptics, often in harsh terms, but that’s not unusual for scientists. Science is a rough arena, as anyone who has ever survived a doctoral examination knows, and scientists aren’t shy about attacking ideas they believe are wrong â€” especially in private communication. Still, Jones et al. could have been more open and accepting of their critics, and if it turns out that e-mails were deleted in response to the Freedom of Information request for data, heads should roll. (Jones maintains that no e-mails or documents were deleted.)

Ultimately, though, we need to place Climategate/Swifthack in its proper context: amidst a decades-long effort by the fossil-fuel industry and other climate skeptics to undercut global-warming research â€” often by means that are far more nefarious than anything that appears in the CRU e-mails. George W. Bush’s Administration attempted to censor NASA climatologist James Hansen, while the fossil-fuel industry group the Global Climate Coalition ignored its own scientists as it spread doubt about man-made global warming. That list of wrongdoing goes on. One of the main skeptic groups promoting the e-mail controversy, the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, was recently revealed to have links to the energy company Exxon-Mobil, which has long funded climate-change deniers. “This is being used to confuse the public,” says blogger James Hoggan, whose new book Climate Cover-Up details Exxon-Mobil’s campaign.