And I don’t blame you for what I’m doing (twist things around as Neil suggested). You just think that because you cannot see your shortcomings regarding rational thinking and the use of logic, or if you do, you deny that and maintain your safe and secure narrow-mindedness. I have shown compromise and interest in various things posted here- but you do not- you guys are the rigid unbending thinkers. I have even conceded that you may be right about global warming (but not about the conspriacy you attach to it- that’s just good old-fashioned American businessmen and women trying to make a buck at someone elses expense- it’s called Capitalism). But, like many other people, I hesitate to become rigid and certain about it since IT IS A FACT THAT THE MAJORITY OF SCIENTISTS STUDYING THIS ISSUE HAVE COME TO CERTAIN CONCLUSIONS ABOUT IT SCIENTIFICALLY, AND AS NON-SCIENTISTS WE FEEL WE NEED TO TRUST THEM AT LEAST A LITTLE BIT. Not to mention some of the possible environmental ramifications would make any sane peson stop and consider that thier arrogance may need to be toned down a bit, if not for themselves then for future generations.

Now THAT is hyperbole. Webster should pay you to use that sentence as an example of it in their next edition.