Comments on: UN Scientists Turn On Each Other

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:10:26 +0000

You like your fanatsy world don’t you Paul? Well, I don’t blame you. The 1950’s was a nice time for America- white America.

I am amazed at your capability to swallow corporate propaganda that quickly (clean coal). The truly brainwashed of course is the last to know he/she is brainwashed. (notice I allow that you have a brain? - your welcome)…

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:09:31 +0000

I like clean coal. It keeps my family warm at 30 below. Is that a problem?

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:42:39 +0000

Oh and FYI there’s no such thing as clean coal, even though Obama has said there is, let alone that oil shale and tar sand- that stuff’s even worse. But don’t worry ya’ll. We humans are goin’ to continue burnin’ them fossil fuels that the good Lord gave us. Just cuz dang nabbit!

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:39:36 +0000

I’ve seen the facts Ben. The ones I believe anyway. You believe yours I beleive mine. However, I really hope you flat-earthers are right so we can go right on polluting this old girl we call mother earth till the cows come home- yeeee haaaaa!

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:53:47 +0000

Thank you Ben, we all needed that! Short and to the point!!

By: Ben

Ben — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:57:21 +0000

Rob N Hood demanding facts? That’s rich. You accept man-made global warming with no facts, so why the change in heart?

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:41:33 +0000

Really? What about nuclear? Clean coal? Shale oil in ND, major finds of oil that could fund us for 200 years and more that we can now extract with new technology? Nobody addresses that. Especially not you nor the media..

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:31:24 +0000

Thank you. I realize that some amount of starvation has probably occurred due to the use of edible plants for bio-fuel, mainly due to the rise in cost of said food. However, there are even greater reasons for the rise in cost of food, mainly the rise in cost of oil. And since fossil fuels are a finite source of energy, and when it runs out we will have global mass starvation, then shall we all work together to fund and discover alternative sources of fuel? Guess not. I guess we’ll just keep our frightened heads buried in the sand and let future generations fight it out, Mad Max style. Yeah, that’s a great idea.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:37:24 +0000

Stand corrected.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:25:43 +0000

I didn’t say you, Paul. Lord Monckton said it. And I didn’t propose a solution to the starvation problem. Just questioning Lord M, something you guys are apparently incapable of doing. Perhaps you need some reading lessons.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:14:44 +0000

You don’t read. I never said Bio fuels cause starvation. If I live in a desert where nothing grows, I have two options, I move to a better location or I starve. What are you missing??? Oh, that’s right. Let America fly/ship in food daily for 50-100 years to feed them. Why not move or get innovative and finally figure it out? Unfortunately the food/money goes to the dictators that live in luxury as we keep feeding them, not their people. We are a caring nation to a fault. By the way Lord M is not my Lord. I only have ONE LORD!

By: Larry

Larry — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:27:04 +0000

Why don’t you pull your head out and Google “biofuel and food prices” and see what results you get? Consider that a pretty hefty percentage of the world lives at subsistence and draw you own conclusions as to the effects of converting arable land into biofuel production.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:16:24 +0000

Blaming the starvation of millions on bio-fuels is a statement that I find hard to swallow. Pardon the pun. I don’t endorse bio-fuels, however, there may be some geographical areas that can grow only certain types of crops such as natural grasses that don’t need a lot of water, fertilizer, etc. to grow, (e.g. switchgrass) that maybe someday could provide a cheap and environmentally friendly alternative energy source. But I am not convinced of that at this time either. But again, it is that statement by your Lord M. that undermines everything else he has to say in my opinion anyway.

By: paul wenum

paul wenum — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:36:13 +0000

Rob, I agree, starvation is a world problem. Is it “global warming?, No. If you live in a desert and there is little water available you probably may starve. If you have too many children in this type of environment, and have no way to feed them, you starve, and children die. That is a fact of life. Do I like it? Hell no, but we cannot be all to everyone. I read a study on potatoes, (I’m not Dan Quayle) wherein if they used spuds worldwide that it may solve more than half the problem. Climate has nothing to do with it. Been to Alaska? I love sweet corn. Cannot find it due to the climate! Hope you love potatoes and cabbage if you live there! As to corn and bio’s. That is the worst thing that we did. Our food prices almost doubled, friends of mine on the farm with beef cattle were on the verge of bankruptcy besides the loss of the water used to make this BS. Take away the 45 cent subsidy and it is more expensive that gas! Enough said.

By: Rob N. Hood

Rob N. Hood — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:25:38 +0000

I don’t support bio-fuels, especially corn. And you need to back up your “starvation” claim with some data, or I won’t believe it. Unfortunately many many people die of starvation everyday, always have and probably always will. Is capitalism out there saving them? Of course not! Never has and never will, so get off your high horse, and back to reality.