<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tory&#8217;s Just wrong, Says Labour Boss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>You are welcome my friend.  I&#039;m honest, I just detest bull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome my friend.  I&#8217;m honest, I just detest bull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>So just another hysterical comment posted previously simply for effect?  I&#039;m shocked, I thought you were always so honest.  I know you were using it as metaphor.  I got it, my comment was thus tongue in cheek.  But thanks for clearing up that important point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just another hysterical comment posted previously simply for effect?  I&#8217;m shocked, I thought you were always so honest.  I know you were using it as metaphor.  I got it, my comment was thus tongue in cheek.  But thanks for clearing up that important point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>I sleep well lately actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sleep well lately actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the delay but I had to consult with my DNC and Kremlin handlers before making this coerced reply:  I believe I have made myself fairly clear about my opinion re; Cap and Trade (not that my opinion or anyone else&#039;s here make any difference).  It is a capitalist solution and will benefit those that are already rich.   If however, it solves the problem like it did for acid rain then great!  I guess that is what you call a win/win situation (something you folks seem to fear and loathe).  Everyone (pretty much) was happy about it in the end- hear about acid rain lately?  No, you haven&#039;t because that problem was solved by capitalists and environmentalists working together.

I don&#039;t prefer that method, and I have explained my preference elsewhere, despite Paul Boy&#039;s lie to the contrary.  I honestly don&#039;t know much about the &quot;Treaty&quot; but I would probably be in favor of it, for similar reasons as stated above, AND because I am not paranoid.  And Neil, I am not actually surprised that you don&#039;t understand my post above, and I am also pleased to know I am your lord and master.  I will utilize you per my wishes when the time comes.  And also Pauly Boy, I would be a hypocrite if I said I was sorry for giving you nightmares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the delay but I had to consult with my DNC and Kremlin handlers before making this coerced reply:  I believe I have made myself fairly clear about my opinion re; Cap and Trade (not that my opinion or anyone else&#8217;s here make any difference).  It is a capitalist solution and will benefit those that are already rich.   If however, it solves the problem like it did for acid rain then great!  I guess that is what you call a win/win situation (something you folks seem to fear and loathe).  Everyone (pretty much) was happy about it in the end- hear about acid rain lately?  No, you haven&#8217;t because that problem was solved by capitalists and environmentalists working together.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t prefer that method, and I have explained my preference elsewhere, despite Paul Boy&#8217;s lie to the contrary.  I honestly don&#8217;t know much about the &#8220;Treaty&#8221; but I would probably be in favor of it, for similar reasons as stated above, AND because I am not paranoid.  And Neil, I am not actually surprised that you don&#8217;t understand my post above, and I am also pleased to know I am your lord and master.  I will utilize you per my wishes when the time comes.  And also Pauly Boy, I would be a hypocrite if I said I was sorry for giving you nightmares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>Agee. It will be our demise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agee. It will be our demise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F. AGWD</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F. AGWD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>Stork: that&#039;s much too black and white to elicite a response from our lord and master Rob. Try to make it more subtle and abstract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stork: that&#8217;s much too black and white to elicite a response from our lord and master Rob. Try to make it more subtle and abstract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F. AGWD</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4316</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F. AGWD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4316</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skipfoss</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4307</link>
		<dc:creator>skipfoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4307</guid>
		<description>Not no but HELL NO this is just another way to tax and sell out America. The climate treaty will sign away the soverenty of the US it will put us even more under the UN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not no but HELL NO this is just another way to tax and sell out America. The climate treaty will sign away the soverenty of the US it will put us even more under the UN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>Lone Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>The real climate change catastrophe

http://tinyurl.com/yzrzjkt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real climate change catastrophe</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/yzrzjkt" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yzrzjkt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4257</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4257</guid>
		<description>Stork, It is cap &amp; Tax.  Very simple actually.  Trust me.  If you listen to Robbie Boy, you will have nightmares.  If you agree with him, so be it.  That is discourse at it&#039;s finest..  Later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stork, It is cap &amp; Tax.  Very simple actually.  Trust me.  If you listen to Robbie Boy, you will have nightmares.  If you agree with him, so be it.  That is discourse at it&#8217;s finest..  Later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stork</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4253</link>
		<dc:creator>Stork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4253</guid>
		<description>RobNHood,
Do you think Cap &#039;n Trade is good, and that the Climate Treaty should be supported in the USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RobNHood,<br />
Do you think Cap &#8216;n Trade is good, and that the Climate Treaty should be supported in the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/torys-just-wrong-says-labour-boss/comment-page-1/#comment-4225</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=659#comment-4225</guid>
		<description>The word propaganda is a Nazi and/or communist kind of thing which has no place in the same sentence as America. Right?

Granted, famed Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein says the CIA has already bought and paid for many successful journalists.

And sure, the New York Times discusses in a matter-of-fact way the use of mainstream writers by the CIA to spread messages.

True, a 4-part BBC documentary called the â€œCentury of the Selfâ€ shows that an American â€“ Freudâ€™s nephew, Edward Bernays â€“ created the modern field of manipulation of public perceptions, and the U.S. government has extensively used his techniques (but the BBC isnâ€™t American, so it doesnâ€™t count).

True, the Independent discusses allegations of American propaganda (but thatâ€™s a British paper, doesnâ€™t count).

And (ho hum) one of the premier writers on journalism says the U.S. has used widespread propaganda.

And (are we still talking about this?) an expert on propaganda testified under oath during trial that the CIA employs THOUSANDS of reporters and OWNS its own media organizations (the expert has an impressive background).

And (I canâ€™t believe weâ€™re still talking about this) while the U.S. government has repeatedly claimed that it was launching propaganda programs solely at foreign enemies, it has actually used them against American citizens. For example:

â€¢In 2002, the Pentagon announced that it was considering spreading false propaganda in the foreign press. However, the military has spread propaganda within the U.S. in an operation so aggressive that one participant, a military analyst, called it â€œpsyops on steroidsâ€œ
â€¢Raw Story confirmed yesterday the use of propaganda on Americans
â€¢The U.S. government long ago announced its intention to â€œfight the netâ€.
â€¢As revealed by an official Pentagon report signed by Rumsfeld called â€œInformation Operations Roadmapâ€:
The roadmap [contains an] acknowledgement that information put out as part of the militaryâ€™s psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans.â€Information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and Psyops, is increasingly consumed by our domestic audience,â€ it reads.

â€œPsyops messages will often be replayed by the news media for much larger audiences, including the American public,â€ it goes on.

â€œStrategy should be based on the premise that the Department [of Defense] will â€˜fight the netâ€™ (and use the net) as it would an enemy weapons systemâ€.

So folks, if true, it appears you don&#039;t need to worry about &quot;Socialist&quot; take-over.  Our Military got your back.  Unless you consider our Military to be part of the &quot;socialist&quot; take-over conspiracy.  In fact, what better way for these propaganda operatives to purposefully blame socialism to fool you?  None better obviously- it is the current bogeyman as this site and many others prove every day.  And you eat it up like mother&#039;s milk.  Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word propaganda is a Nazi and/or communist kind of thing which has no place in the same sentence as America. Right?</p>
<p>Granted, famed Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein says the CIA has already bought and paid for many successful journalists.</p>
<p>And sure, the New York Times discusses in a matter-of-fact way the use of mainstream writers by the CIA to spread messages.</p>
<p>True, a 4-part BBC documentary called the â€œCentury of the Selfâ€ shows that an American â€“ Freudâ€™s nephew, Edward Bernays â€“ created the modern field of manipulation of public perceptions, and the U.S. government has extensively used his techniques (but the BBC isnâ€™t American, so it doesnâ€™t count).</p>
<p>True, the Independent discusses allegations of American propaganda (but thatâ€™s a British paper, doesnâ€™t count).</p>
<p>And (ho hum) one of the premier writers on journalism says the U.S. has used widespread propaganda.</p>
<p>And (are we still talking about this?) an expert on propaganda testified under oath during trial that the CIA employs THOUSANDS of reporters and OWNS its own media organizations (the expert has an impressive background).</p>
<p>And (I canâ€™t believe weâ€™re still talking about this) while the U.S. government has repeatedly claimed that it was launching propaganda programs solely at foreign enemies, it has actually used them against American citizens. For example:</p>
<p>â€¢In 2002, the Pentagon announced that it was considering spreading false propaganda in the foreign press. However, the military has spread propaganda within the U.S. in an operation so aggressive that one participant, a military analyst, called it â€œpsyops on steroidsâ€œ<br />
â€¢Raw Story confirmed yesterday the use of propaganda on Americans<br />
â€¢The U.S. government long ago announced its intention to â€œfight the netâ€.<br />
â€¢As revealed by an official Pentagon report signed by Rumsfeld called â€œInformation Operations Roadmapâ€:<br />
The roadmap [contains an] acknowledgement that information put out as part of the militaryâ€™s psychological operations, or Psyops, is finding its way onto the computer and television screens of ordinary Americans.â€Information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and Psyops, is increasingly consumed by our domestic audience,â€ it reads.</p>
<p>â€œPsyops messages will often be replayed by the news media for much larger audiences, including the American public,â€ it goes on.</p>
<p>â€œStrategy should be based on the premise that the Department [of Defense] will â€˜fight the netâ€™ (and use the net) as it would an enemy weapons systemâ€.</p>
<p>So folks, if true, it appears you don&#8217;t need to worry about &#8220;Socialist&#8221; take-over.  Our Military got your back.  Unless you consider our Military to be part of the &#8220;socialist&#8221; take-over conspiracy.  In fact, what better way for these propaganda operatives to purposefully blame socialism to fool you?  None better obviously- it is the current bogeyman as this site and many others prove every day.  And you eat it up like mother&#8217;s milk.  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

