<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Anyone Read the Copenhagen Agreement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-6762</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-6762</guid>
		<description>Well it seems that you are almost right. Communism (and thus, statism) seems to be the next stop of a society in decline. I'd hardly call it evolution, though. It's devolution and will hasten our plunge into the economic abyss. What I can't wrap my head around is that some people actually relish the idea, look foreward to it, and try to bring it about. We've witnessed the horror of communism around the world, seen it's abject failure, the misery it causes people forced to live under it. What do you think a communist society would be like? What would it mean to your life? Paint me a picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems that you are almost right. Communism (and thus, statism) seems to be the next stop of a society in decline. I&#8217;d hardly call it evolution, though. It&#8217;s devolution and will hasten our plunge into the economic abyss. What I can&#8217;t wrap my head around is that some people actually relish the idea, look foreward to it, and try to bring it about. We&#8217;ve witnessed the horror of communism around the world, seen it&#8217;s abject failure, the misery it causes people forced to live under it. What do you think a communist society would be like? What would it mean to your life? Paint me a picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny seven</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-6713</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-6713</guid>
		<description>Look, people admit it, you have lost.  Constitutional Republics last only 200 years and then must be replaced by a more social progressive evolved approach.  It is not worth fretting about, there is now no way you can ever win.  While you were sitting on your fat decadent asses we were out knocking on doors and convincing people we all need to vote for more socially responsible people.  Face it Communism is the natural evolution of societies and can never be stopped.  Delayed yes but never stopped.  Even if our Congress is replaced this fall our public schools will continue to educate our youth that socialism is responsible living.  Give it up.  It is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, people admit it, you have lost.  Constitutional Republics last only 200 years and then must be replaced by a more social progressive evolved approach.  It is not worth fretting about, there is now no way you can ever win.  While you were sitting on your fat decadent asses we were out knocking on doors and convincing people we all need to vote for more socially responsible people.  Face it Communism is the natural evolution of societies and can never be stopped.  Delayed yes but never stopped.  Even if our Congress is replaced this fall our public schools will continue to educate our youth that socialism is responsible living.  Give it up.  It is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeong chun phuoc</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-5898</link>
		<dc:creator>jeong chun phuoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-5898</guid>
		<description>"COP 15 : Climate Open Pandora"

Without a binding agreement, there is no go for COP 15.

Without aid from developed countries, developing countries cannot be blamed for not co-operating.

Without developed countries support, developing economies will continue to use anti-green technologies.

There is a need for green environmental strategy. Having more COP15 is not a viable solution at all.


Jeong Chun phuoc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;COP 15 : Climate Open Pandora&#8221;</p>
<p>Without a binding agreement, there is no go for COP 15.</p>
<p>Without aid from developed countries, developing countries cannot be blamed for not co-operating.</p>
<p>Without developed countries support, developing economies will continue to use anti-green technologies.</p>
<p>There is a need for green environmental strategy. Having more COP15 is not a viable solution at all.</p>
<p>Jeong Chun phuoc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4889</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4889</guid>
		<description>Thank You Dan!  I needed that.  You made my day with an excellent factual answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You Dan!  I needed that.  You made my day with an excellent factual answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McGrath</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>Holy crap. How old are you, where did you go to school and are you kidding?

Democracy, is of course an often-used term of simplification to describe any society that provides the citizens the right to vote, but a true democracy would be a society wherein the people vote directly on legislation (such as ballot initiataves in California). A Republic consists of representatives of the people who may or may not be elected and who vote in a democratic fashion on legislation. Specifically, the United States was established to be a Constitutional Republic. That is, a republic where the representatives do not have unchecked power, but are limited by the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution. Our founders were brilliant in establishing our form of government as it guarantees equal protection under the law, protecting the rights and liberty of minorities from the tyranny of a majority. Pure democracy would trample the rights of minorities.

Democracy in itself is not a virtue. Without the protections of a constitution making certain untouchable guarantees of rights, a democracy would be a horrible tyranny.

http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap. How old are you, where did you go to school and are you kidding?</p>
<p>Democracy, is of course an often-used term of simplification to describe any society that provides the citizens the right to vote, but a true democracy would be a society wherein the people vote directly on legislation (such as ballot initiataves in California). A Republic consists of representatives of the people who may or may not be elected and who vote in a democratic fashion on legislation. Specifically, the United States was established to be a Constitutional Republic. That is, a republic where the representatives do not have unchecked power, but are limited by the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution. Our founders were brilliant in establishing our form of government as it guarantees equal protection under the law, protecting the rights and liberty of minorities from the tyranny of a majority. Pure democracy would trample the rights of minorities.</p>
<p>Democracy in itself is not a virtue. Without the protections of a constitution making certain untouchable guarantees of rights, a democracy would be a horrible tyranny.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corneilius</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>corneilius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4872</guid>
		<description>Voting without complete and transparent oversight of those selected is no choice at all, as it leaves room for corruption. Voting without active and ongoing participation  (which is power true sharing) is also a fraud.

For those reasons democracy, as practiced, is a fraud.

The remedy is as follows :

Undermine the power of parties, ban private funding of parties, ban 'party line'/'party whip' and make lobbying transparent, both of which are currently enforced  because no-one at the grass roots level would abide by such behaviour amongst their own neighbours, and why would they chose otherwise? Institute a recall process for all positions of public office, at all levels, from grass-roots to the executive. Make it easier for independent representatives to enter. Give more decision making powers and the resources to effectively make decisions at the grass roots local level.

In a word, give people real power and they will use it wisely. This is proven by the very fact that the system is rigged AGAINST people power.

And for all these reasons, Democracy as practiced is a fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voting without complete and transparent oversight of those selected is no choice at all, as it leaves room for corruption. Voting without active and ongoing participation  (which is power true sharing) is also a fraud.</p>
<p>For those reasons democracy, as practiced, is a fraud.</p>
<p>The remedy is as follows :</p>
<p>Undermine the power of parties, ban private funding of parties, ban &#8216;party line&#8217;/'party whip&#8217; and make lobbying transparent, both of which are currently enforced  because no-one at the grass roots level would abide by such behaviour amongst their own neighbours, and why would they chose otherwise? Institute a recall process for all positions of public office, at all levels, from grass-roots to the executive. Make it easier for independent representatives to enter. Give more decision making powers and the resources to effectively make decisions at the grass roots local level.</p>
<p>In a word, give people real power and they will use it wisely. This is proven by the very fact that the system is rigged AGAINST people power.</p>
<p>And for all these reasons, Democracy as practiced is a fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>What is this about the USA NOT being a DEMOCRACY?  Are you people nuts?  Even Bush talked about it constantly and how other countries want what we have (democracy), and his mission from God was to get it to them, even via war (thanks again for that W)  And so, WHY DO WE VOTE...??!!  Because we are a "Representative Republic" ??!!  I would like to hear from someone about this, and not a winger, because I basically don't trust what they say, they are extremists and believe whatever they hear from the echo chamber.  So please- some lawyer or someone very smart please educate about this- I really want to know.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this about the USA NOT being a DEMOCRACY?  Are you people nuts?  Even Bush talked about it constantly and how other countries want what we have (democracy), and his mission from God was to get it to them, even via war (thanks again for that W)  And so, WHY DO WE VOTE&#8230;??!!  Because we are a &#8220;Representative Republic&#8221; ??!!  I would like to hear from someone about this, and not a winger, because I basically don&#8217;t trust what they say, they are extremists and believe whatever they hear from the echo chamber.  So please- some lawyer or someone very smart please educate about this- I really want to know.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4865</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4865</guid>
		<description>Very well said cornelius!  I will add this, as a slightly different way of explaining the same thing:

In early 1944 the New York Times asked Vice President Wallace to, as Wallace noted, "write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?"

Vice President Wallace's answers to those questions were published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the WWII Axis powers of Germany and Japan:

"The really dangerous American fascists," Wallace wrote, "are not those who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger on those... With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power."

"American fascism will not be really dangerous," he added in the next paragraph, "until there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the deliberate poisoners of public information..."

Noting that, "Fascism is a worldwide disease," Wallace further suggested that fascism's "greatest threat to the United States will come after the war" and will manifest "within the United States itself."

In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism the Vice President of the United States saw rising in America, he added:

"They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection."

Finally, Wallace said, "The myth of fascist efficiency has deluded many people. ... Democracy, to crush fascism internally, must...develop the ability to keep people fully employed and at the same time balance the budget. It must put human beings first and dollars second. It must appeal to reason and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not tolerate oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in the form of monopolies and cartels."

As Wallace's President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, said when he accepted his party's renomination in 1936 in Philadelphia:
"...Out of this modern civilization, economic royalists [have] carved new dynasties.... It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction.... And as a result the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man...."

Speaking indirectly of the fascists that Wallace would directly name almost a decade later, Roosevelt brought the issue to its core:
"These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said cornelius!  I will add this, as a slightly different way of explaining the same thing:</p>
<p>In early 1944 the New York Times asked Vice President Wallace to, as Wallace noted, &#8220;write a piece answering the following questions: What is a fascist? How many fascists have we? How dangerous are they?&#8221;</p>
<p>Vice President Wallace&#8217;s answers to those questions were published in The New York Times on April 9, 1944, at the height of the war against the WWII Axis powers of Germany and Japan:</p>
<p>&#8220;The really dangerous American fascists,&#8221; Wallace wrote, &#8220;are not those who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger on those&#8230; With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;American fascism will not be really dangerous,&#8221; he added in the next paragraph, &#8220;until there is a purposeful coalition among the cartelists, the deliberate poisoners of public information&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Noting that, &#8220;Fascism is a worldwide disease,&#8221; Wallace further suggested that fascism&#8217;s &#8220;greatest threat to the United States will come after the war&#8221; and will manifest &#8220;within the United States itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism the Vice President of the United States saw rising in America, he added:</p>
<p>&#8220;They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, Wallace said, &#8220;The myth of fascist efficiency has deluded many people. &#8230; Democracy, to crush fascism internally, must&#8230;develop the ability to keep people fully employed and at the same time balance the budget. It must put human beings first and dollars second. It must appeal to reason and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not tolerate oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in the form of monopolies and cartels.&#8221;</p>
<p>As Wallace&#8217;s President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, said when he accepted his party&#8217;s renomination in 1936 in Philadelphia:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;Out of this modern civilization, economic royalists [have] carved new dynasties&#8230;. It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction&#8230;. And as a result the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking indirectly of the fascists that Wallace would directly name almost a decade later, Roosevelt brought the issue to its core:<br />
&#8220;These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corneilius</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4860</link>
		<dc:creator>corneilius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4860</guid>
		<description>The facts are that power is exercised over living beings, human and non-human, in ways that diminish both, in ways that are degrading the abundance of the environment, in ways that are not subject to the will of the people of the land (voting changes the overall abuse not a whit, as much as switching lightbulbs will do anything other than salve a flaccid conscience).

Whether it's the US Government or the Iranian Government, the Catholic Church or Islam, the IMF or the WTO, decisions that are properly those of the people of the land are made by distal powers whose experience is inadequate to the task of knowing what people need and truely want, and therefore relies upon theory and belief for it's action. Such a basis for action is bound by it's inadequacies to cause harm. 

That harm, vast and yet somehow invisible to many, is rationalised as a 'sacrifice', or 'collateral damage' or 'the price of freedom' or 'enduring freedom' or worse, it is rationalised as evolution, the survival of the fittest, as progress.

Until we recognise that a) we are fully of nature b) that the function of ALL living beings on Earth is to improve the habitat for ALL living beings c) that the processes of power and dominance start with the domination of our children, who become adapted to that dynamic of dominance, and so become troopers, cops, weapons scientists, corporate managers, bankers and mercenaries as much as those who become rapists, murderers, and abusers of all hue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The facts are that power is exercised over living beings, human and non-human, in ways that diminish both, in ways that are degrading the abundance of the environment, in ways that are not subject to the will of the people of the land (voting changes the overall abuse not a whit, as much as switching lightbulbs will do anything other than salve a flaccid conscience).</p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s the US Government or the Iranian Government, the Catholic Church or Islam, the IMF or the WTO, decisions that are properly those of the people of the land are made by distal powers whose experience is inadequate to the task of knowing what people need and truely want, and therefore relies upon theory and belief for it&#8217;s action. Such a basis for action is bound by it&#8217;s inadequacies to cause harm. </p>
<p>That harm, vast and yet somehow invisible to many, is rationalised as a &#8217;sacrifice&#8217;, or &#8216;collateral damage&#8217; or &#8216;the price of freedom&#8217; or &#8216;enduring freedom&#8217; or worse, it is rationalised as evolution, the survival of the fittest, as progress.</p>
<p>Until we recognise that a) we are fully of nature b) that the function of ALL living beings on Earth is to improve the habitat for ALL living beings c) that the processes of power and dominance start with the domination of our children, who become adapted to that dynamic of dominance, and so become troopers, cops, weapons scientists, corporate managers, bankers and mercenaries as much as those who become rapists, murderers, and abusers of all hue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4841</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4841</guid>
		<description>A broken record you are, a broken record you will continue to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A broken record you are, a broken record you will continue to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4824</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4824</guid>
		<description>Sure they do this.  But it is not the MAIN problem.  And of course they don't reveal EVERYTHING they dig up.  All it takes is MONEY and certain things stay hidden, unless of course the thing is really bad.  But even then... Just look at Iran/Contra.  That was basically hidden, enough wnayway to allow Bush I to be elected office.  What he was involved in when he was Vice Pres was treason, no less.  There are MANY examples of this.  Both Reagun and Nixon did the same thing to get elected as Pres, and the MSM added and abetted the.  Your statment is very simple and naive.  Very easy just to blame the media, as conservatives like to do.  The media has released many things against Dems running for office, so I don't know what you are complaining about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure they do this.  But it is not the MAIN problem.  And of course they don&#8217;t reveal EVERYTHING they dig up.  All it takes is MONEY and certain things stay hidden, unless of course the thing is really bad.  But even then&#8230; Just look at Iran/Contra.  That was basically hidden, enough wnayway to allow Bush I to be elected office.  What he was involved in when he was Vice Pres was treason, no less.  There are MANY examples of this.  Both Reagun and Nixon did the same thing to get elected as Pres, and the MSM added and abetted the.  Your statment is very simple and naive.  Very easy just to blame the media, as conservatives like to do.  The media has released many things against Dems running for office, so I don&#8217;t know what you are complaining about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul wenum</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4796</link>
		<dc:creator>paul wenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4796</guid>
		<description>Rob, The reason most honorable people, not the I'm honorable, choose not to run for office when they should is due to our media that digs up or makes up anything that you have done since you were born.  If you farted in church at 6 years old it is in the papers as "News of the day."  This, I believe you and I agree on, honest people with honest convictions/beliefs and visions cannot, nor will not run for office.  In today's society that is so media driven to find the "dirt" on anyone is sickening to me.  They don't investigate the positive, only the negatives.  I have great respect for anyone that runs for office, be it republican, democrat, independent as well as others.  They, by the way, will be our future and that's why voting COUNTS!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, The reason most honorable people, not the I&#8217;m honorable, choose not to run for office when they should is due to our media that digs up or makes up anything that you have done since you were born.  If you farted in church at 6 years old it is in the papers as &#8220;News of the day.&#8221;  This, I believe you and I agree on, honest people with honest convictions/beliefs and visions cannot, nor will not run for office.  In today&#8217;s society that is so media driven to find the &#8220;dirt&#8221; on anyone is sickening to me.  They don&#8217;t investigate the positive, only the negatives.  I have great respect for anyone that runs for office, be it republican, democrat, independent as well as others.  They, by the way, will be our future and that&#8217;s why voting COUNTS!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>Right on Danny, I agree.  But I am doing what I am doing to try and wake people up, and it's the best way I know how.  It gets their attention,  but I'm sorry, but it really does come down to that- I look at it more from a psycho-social perspective really than political.  But we HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT BECAUSE THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM IS WHAT WE GOT.  Yes, we need to change it- many Dems agree with that, but there is a big stubborn block of Repbus that NEED TO WAKE UP.  Thus me messis' with em' cuz they are HERE, on this site.

Paul- why don't you run for office.  Your excuses would probably be the same as mine.  However, maybe not- my reasons are this:  I don't beleive in the systme the way it is- I wouldn't get one little toe in the door let alone my foot, and one big reason is MONEY.  And all the other reasons why regular people like us are SHUT OUT.  Bottom line- I believe the entire polotical process in this country is broken and CORRUPT.  Why would I wan to join THAT, even if I could?  And look what happened to JFK when he tried to act like a Prez with balls.  And that is why Obama is acting so timid.  He is basically doing what the power elite want him to.  Need I say more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Danny, I agree.  But I am doing what I am doing to try and wake people up, and it&#8217;s the best way I know how.  It gets their attention,  but I&#8217;m sorry, but it really does come down to that- I look at it more from a psycho-social perspective really than political.  But we HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT BECAUSE THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM IS WHAT WE GOT.  Yes, we need to change it- many Dems agree with that, but there is a big stubborn block of Repbus that NEED TO WAKE UP.  Thus me messis&#8217; with em&#8217; cuz they are HERE, on this site.</p>
<p>Paul- why don&#8217;t you run for office.  Your excuses would probably be the same as mine.  However, maybe not- my reasons are this:  I don&#8217;t beleive in the systme the way it is- I wouldn&#8217;t get one little toe in the door let alone my foot, and one big reason is MONEY.  And all the other reasons why regular people like us are SHUT OUT.  Bottom line- I believe the entire polotical process in this country is broken and CORRUPT.  Why would I wan to join THAT, even if I could?  And look what happened to JFK when he tried to act like a Prez with balls.  And that is why Obama is acting so timid.  He is basically doing what the power elite want him to.  Need I say more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandy baer</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>sandy baer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>You hit it right on the head.  The world is huge and largely unpopulated.  If they would only look at a globe.  Mostly water and inhospitable wasteland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit it right on the head.  The world is huge and largely unpopulated.  If they would only look at a globe.  Mostly water and inhospitable wasteland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/10/has-anyone-read-the-copenhagen-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=670#comment-4734</guid>
		<description>Why would you even think about saying yes to this "silly" treaty? There is absolutely no reason. Just say NO. DO NOT SAY YES!!! SAY NO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you even think about saying yes to this &#8220;silly&#8221; treaty? There is absolutely no reason. Just say NO. DO NOT SAY YES!!! SAY NO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
