And Neil, just as “calling a spade is a spade”, a success is a success. I actually don’t agree with Cap and Trade in it’s most basic form. It is a capitalist solution, but it apparently worked very well for the acid rain problem. I did not say it will work for this problem- but I’m sorry they are similar enough to predict that it could. My solution to these problems is the simplest- tax polluters so they pay for the entire cost of their business rather than soak the tax-payer for the clean-up and other negative repercussions. Why? Because that would be true capitalsim. Why? Because the business would fail if it could not do that, and that is an important part of true capitalsim is it not? Problem is we do not have true capitalism in this country- probably never did. That is part of the on-going propaganda isn’t it? Big business is covered by it’s own form of socialism meaning if they get into trouble the tax-payers (via govt.) bail them out. Too big to fail. But if you or I get into trouble we are on our own, too bad too sad. That is NOT what America should be about and it’s one of the big lies that people need to wake up about.

Turns out it was C. Boyden Gray’s idea, in the 1980’s. Who is he? Well he was as a lawyer in the Ronald Reagan white house. Adn who signed it into law? GHW Bush, when he was president, in 1990. The newest version targeted at Climate Change or Global Warming of course is Al Gore. But he never invented the idea, nor did he ever allude that he did of course. It’s a 20 year old idea, created by and implemented by Republicans. Why? Because it took the power away from environmentalists and gave it back to industry. Plus it worked very well, reduced acid rain to where it no longer was an issue. Global warming was also discussed at the time during the first Bush administration and how Cap and Trade if successful for acid rain might be able to be used for that problem as well.

Not only that but John Sununnu, the white house chief of staff at the time “was furous” about the plan because it “was going to shut the economy down.” But of course no such thing happened. In fact the benefits of cleaning up acid rain are estimated at $122 billion, and the cost to industry is just 3 billion. The original estimate of the cost to industry was $25 billion.

So instead of your knee jerk reactions to things you think are some kind of Liberal conspriacy, you shoul, #1 actually research something sufficiently and #2. Be proud of the innovative things the Republicans have done that have turned out successfully- and this is one good example of that, apparently.

Just when you thought you’d seen all the health-insurance evil possible, now comes another shocker: a UnitedHealth subsidiary in Colorado denied coverage to Peggy Robertson, mother of two, because she wasn’t sterilized after her caesarian-section delivery procedure, according to a letter made public. Almost 1/3 of all deliveries are done by c-section–meaning that in Colorado and likely elsewhere, fertile women are regularly denied coverage unless they agree to sterilize their wombs. This comes after reports that a health insurance company considered rape to also be a “pre-existing condition.” The meaning is clear: America’s health insurance industry hates us all, and they hate fertile women most of all, if only because they represent two detestable Americans in one body.

I know for that the Al Gore movie regarding global warming is wrong in 9 particular points according to the media reports from England.
I also know that planet earth as something that is alive, that the ozone layer of this planet in the southern hemisphere was declared dead of March or May of 1993 (Time or U.S. News and World report Cover Story). By surprise that you do research to confirm that most jets fly in what was/is the ozone layer (try research of wickipedia re ozone). By my surprise in the last year that I find that that now we have 400% more ultraviolet sun radiation radiating through the southern hemisphere of this planet than with ozone layer. ASK THE U.S. GOV FOR OR PUBLISH YOUR OWN DATA FOR: (1) THE SPECIFICATIONS OF WHAT % OZONE LAYER EXISTS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE OF THIS PLANET AND (1.A) THE RATE OF CHANGE PER YEAR; (2) WHAT IS THE EQUIVALENT INCREASE IN WARMING BY ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION (AND (2.1.) OTHER PARTIAL MASSES EMITTED BY THE SUN, THE RANGE OF MASSES EMITTED BY THE SUN IS HUGE) OF (2.A) THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE, (2.B) THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE; AND THE (EQUIVALENT) BTU’S ADSORBED BY THIS PLANET IN TERMS OF (EQUIVALENT) BTU’S PER SQUARE MILE OR SQUARE KILOMETER. THIS IS ONE ASPENT OF GLOBAL WARMING. Why no U.S. Fed data? What web site anywhere in the world to publish this data, U.S. OR any other foreign power, OR BY THE UNITED NATIONS? WHO LIES TO YOUR FACE?
Suppose ultraviolet radiation (mass, e=mc2) is the most insignificant radiation of mass coming through what was an ozone layer?

Not an insult, factual different perceptions. Suppose this is the smallest most insignificant picture that one with a Bachelors of Science degree can possibly convey to those who have a Bachelors of Arts degree and has 20% less IQ and may probably never comprehend the whole picture see by one with a Bachelors of Science degree?