<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scared Silly About Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>One question for proponents of AGW. Why is there STILL more ice in the Arctic? According to the AGW theory, warming should be accellerating. It is not. In fact, it must be much cooler in the Arctic this year because as reported by the NSIDC the ice that is there now is &quot;young, thin&quot; ice. So even if temperatures were exactly the same as they were in 2007 the ice level would be much lower because the &quot;young, thin&quot; ice would have melted more rapidly than the &quot;old, thick&quot; ice.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question for proponents of AGW. Why is there STILL more ice in the Arctic? According to the AGW theory, warming should be accellerating. It is not. In fact, it must be much cooler in the Arctic this year because as reported by the NSIDC the ice that is there now is &#8220;young, thin&#8221; ice. So even if temperatures were exactly the same as they were in 2007 the ice level would be much lower because the &#8220;young, thin&#8221; ice would have melted more rapidly than the &#8220;old, thick&#8221; ice.<br />
<a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>&quot;The earth&#039;s overall temperature in the last several years has either remained steady or slightly decreased -- depending on which side of the issue is interpreting the data. No one is maintaining that the world is getting warmer and warmer every single year, which was the initial prediction.&quot;
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/after_global_warming.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The earth&#8217;s overall temperature in the last several years has either remained steady or slightly decreased &#8212; depending on which side of the issue is interpreting the data. No one is maintaining that the world is getting warmer and warmer every single year, which was the initial prediction.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/after_global_warming.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/after_global_warming.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>&quot;What does it all mean? Well, we have cooled recently. But those things can happen. The 12+ falt period is getting long enough to become statistically relevant, but looking at the RSS data set just doesnâ€™t give us a large enough data set to compare likelihood. Longer term periods definitely show that we have warmed over a lengthier period of time â€“ thatâ€™s not really in dispute. However, any claims of acceleration in warming are simply false, as can be shown by the fact that ALL trend line measures are declining. If warming were accelerating, we would see slopes increasing.&quot;
http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/june-2009-update-on-global-and-regional-temperature-rss/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What does it all mean? Well, we have cooled recently. But those things can happen. The 12+ falt period is getting long enough to become statistically relevant, but looking at the RSS data set just doesnâ€™t give us a large enough data set to compare likelihood. Longer term periods definitely show that we have warmed over a lengthier period of time â€“ thatâ€™s not really in dispute. However, any claims of acceleration in warming are simply false, as can be shown by the fact that ALL trend line measures are declining. If warming were accelerating, we would see slopes increasing.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/june-2009-update-on-global-and-regional-temperature-rss/" rel="nofollow">http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/june-2009-update-on-global-and-regional-temperature-rss/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>Lone Wolf:
Amen!
I wish the government would read the actual IPCC assessment reports instead of the summaries for policy makers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lone Wolf:<br />
Amen!<br />
I wish the government would read the actual IPCC assessment reports instead of the summaries for policy makers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>â€œIn climate research and modeling, we should recognize that
we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and
therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not
possible.â€ (TAR, p.774.)
http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FoS_Computer%20Climate%20Models.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œIn climate research and modeling, we should recognize that<br />
we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and<br />
therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not<br />
possible.â€ (TAR, p.774.)<br />
<a href="http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FoS_Computer%20Climate%20Models.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FoS_Computer%20Climate%20Models.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>Lone Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>You got it exactly right Neil.  The government can help, it only needs to get out of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it exactly right Neil.  The government can help, it only needs to get out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/06/scared-silly-about-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-2426</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=415#comment-2426</guid>
		<description>Bjorn Lomborg, now this is a guy that I can respect. Even though he believes in AGW, he recognizes the fear tacticts used by many of the supporters of AGW. And I agree with him that there are many things that are not focused upon because of all the alarmism. 
It is an undisputed fact that the climate changes. It always has, and always will. It makes more sense to prepare for changes, and attempt to advance the technology to better predict those changes, than to make draconian alterations to society out of fear.
It might suprise some of you to know that I am not completely against alternative energies such as solar and wind. I think if you want to put solar panels on your roof, or have a wind turbine in your backyard, or if you wat to hook up a generator to a treadmill, whatever, I have no problem with that. But to have the government mandate these things on a massive scale is unacceptable. And for us to make such changes because of alarmism and fear is simpley idiotic.
I am not afraid of change, I just think that changes should come from forethought and planning, not from kneejerk reactions to fear. 
And I think Bjorn would agree with that. 

Que Rob as to why I&#039;m a moron for thinking that.....and.......GO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bjorn Lomborg, now this is a guy that I can respect. Even though he believes in AGW, he recognizes the fear tacticts used by many of the supporters of AGW. And I agree with him that there are many things that are not focused upon because of all the alarmism.<br />
It is an undisputed fact that the climate changes. It always has, and always will. It makes more sense to prepare for changes, and attempt to advance the technology to better predict those changes, than to make draconian alterations to society out of fear.<br />
It might suprise some of you to know that I am not completely against alternative energies such as solar and wind. I think if you want to put solar panels on your roof, or have a wind turbine in your backyard, or if you wat to hook up a generator to a treadmill, whatever, I have no problem with that. But to have the government mandate these things on a massive scale is unacceptable. And for us to make such changes because of alarmism and fear is simpley idiotic.<br />
I am not afraid of change, I just think that changes should come from forethought and planning, not from kneejerk reactions to fear.<br />
And I think Bjorn would agree with that. </p>
<p>Que Rob as to why I&#8217;m a moron for thinking that&#8230;..and&#8230;&#8230;.GO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

