<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protectionism in the Name of Global Warming Regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/</link>
	<description>Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shawn doering</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn doering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>Every one knows how a top works ? Right !?   I promise you this. When enough water reaches the Equator, the Earth will start to wobble an where will the water go then? The earth has never had this many people on it before. An this many people can't get along with each other ! something will happen ! But to punish Americans for CO2. This will send all industry to China an India . Free trade already started the process. What will stop the rest from leaving ??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every one knows how a top works ? Right !?   I promise you this. When enough water reaches the Equator, the Earth will start to wobble an where will the water go then? The earth has never had this many people on it before. An this many people can&#8217;t get along with each other ! something will happen ! But to punish Americans for CO2. This will send all industry to China an India . Free trade already started the process. What will stop the rest from leaving ??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>BBBBBroken record..... alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBBBBroken record&#8230;.. alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2074</guid>
		<description>Talk about a broken record... AND you are addicted to junk science.  What's wrong with good old-fashioned junk food??  Get a life Neil, or a girlfriend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about a broken record&#8230; AND you are addicted to junk science.  What&#8217;s wrong with good old-fashioned junk food??  Get a life Neil, or a girlfriend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png
Wer'e going to have to move south pretty soon at this rate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a><br />
Wer&#8217;e going to have to move south pretty soon at this rate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>I think your ice is on the wrong track. It just might be a mile thick over your head come 2013.
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your ice is on the wrong track. It just might be a mile thick over your head come 2013.<br />
<a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2064</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2064</guid>
		<description>Sea ice extent averaged over the month of March 2009 was 15.16 million square kilometers (5.85 million square miles). This was 730,000 square kilometers (282,000 square miles) above the record low of 2006, but 590,000 square kilometers (228,000 square miles) below the 1979 to 2000 average.

http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sea ice extent averaged over the month of March 2009 was 15.16 million square kilometers (5.85 million square miles). This was 730,000 square kilometers (282,000 square miles) above the record low of 2006, but 590,000 square kilometers (228,000 square miles) below the 1979 to 2000 average.</p>
<p><a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/01/global_warmmongering_more_silk.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/01/global_warmmongering_more_silk.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/01/global_warmmongering_more_silk.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>http://www.dailytech.com/Sea+Ice+Ends+Year+at+Same+Level+as+1979/article13834.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Sea+Ice+Ends+Year+at+Same+Level+as+1979/article13834.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailytech.com/Sea+Ice+Ends+Year+at+Same+Level+as+1979/article13834.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>And......
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020130074839.htm
Another hmmmmm...........
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And&#8230;&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020130074839.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020130074839.htm</a><br />
Another hmmmmm&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
<a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Are volcano's a symptom of AGW?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080120160720.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are volcano&#8217;s a symptom of AGW?<br />
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080120160720.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080120160720.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm........
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
<a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob N. Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob N. Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>Would it really matter where I get my info.?   No, it would not, because you wouldn't really care or believe it anyway.  Besides, it is about getting people to think for themselves, is it not?  You people who don't believe anything that is not fuel-powered or have some rpm's will never yield or truly have an open mind.  What say you about the article below?  (oh, please let me guess! :   It has nothing to do with global warming, or it is false, or it is just a coincidence... etc. etc. etc.  You people are extremely predictable, ya know?

WASHINGTON, April 3 (Reuters) - One Antarctic ice shelf has quickly vanished, another is disappearing and glaciers are melting faster than anyone thought due to climate change, U.S. and British government researchers reported on Friday.

They said the Wordie Ice Shelf, which had been disintegrating since the 1960s, is gone and the northern part of the Larsen Ice Shelf no longer exists. More than 3,200 square miles (8,300 square km) have broken off from the Larsen shelf since 1986.

Climate change is to blame, according to the report from the U.S. Geological Survey and the British Antarctic Survey, available at pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2600/B.

"The rapid retreat of glaciers there demonstrates once again the profound effects our planet is already experiencing -- more rapidly than previously known -- as a consequence of climate change," U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a statement.

"This continued and often significant glacier retreat is a wakeup call that change is happening ... and we need to be prepared," USGS glaciologist Jane Ferrigno, who led the Antarctica study, said in a statement.

"Antarctica is of special interest because it holds an estimated 91 percent of the Earth's glacier volume, and change anywhere in the ice sheet poses significant hazards to society," she said.

In another report published in the journal Geophysical Letters, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports that ice is melting much more rapidly than expected in the Arctic as well, based on new computer analyses and recent ice measurements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it really matter where I get my info.?   No, it would not, because you wouldn&#8217;t really care or believe it anyway.  Besides, it is about getting people to think for themselves, is it not?  You people who don&#8217;t believe anything that is not fuel-powered or have some rpm&#8217;s will never yield or truly have an open mind.  What say you about the article below?  (oh, please let me guess! :   It has nothing to do with global warming, or it is false, or it is just a coincidence&#8230; etc. etc. etc.  You people are extremely predictable, ya know?</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, April 3 (Reuters) - One Antarctic ice shelf has quickly vanished, another is disappearing and glaciers are melting faster than anyone thought due to climate change, U.S. and British government researchers reported on Friday.</p>
<p>They said the Wordie Ice Shelf, which had been disintegrating since the 1960s, is gone and the northern part of the Larsen Ice Shelf no longer exists. More than 3,200 square miles (8,300 square km) have broken off from the Larsen shelf since 1986.</p>
<p>Climate change is to blame, according to the report from the U.S. Geological Survey and the British Antarctic Survey, available at pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2600/B.</p>
<p>&#8220;The rapid retreat of glaciers there demonstrates once again the profound effects our planet is already experiencing &#8212; more rapidly than previously known &#8212; as a consequence of climate change,&#8221; U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said in a statement.</p>
<p>&#8220;This continued and often significant glacier retreat is a wakeup call that change is happening &#8230; and we need to be prepared,&#8221; USGS glaciologist Jane Ferrigno, who led the Antarctica study, said in a statement.</p>
<p>&#8220;Antarctica is of special interest because it holds an estimated 91 percent of the Earth&#8217;s glacier volume, and change anywhere in the ice sheet poses significant hazards to society,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>In another report published in the journal Geophysical Letters, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reports that ice is melting much more rapidly than expected in the Arctic as well, based on new computer analyses and recent ice measurements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 02:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>Looks like the ice has other ideas: http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the ice has other ideas: <a href="http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png" rel="nofollow">http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_timeseries.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>Rob: Before I do stop responding to you I have some suggested reading for you. http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalflawsinreasoning/a/confirmation.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/confirmation_bias.htm
http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/appendixe/appendixe.html
http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html#SECTION02121000000000000000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob: Before I do stop responding to you I have some suggested reading for you. <a href="http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalflawsinreasoning/a/confirmation.htm" rel="nofollow">http://atheism.about.com/od/logicalflawsinreasoning/a/confirmation.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/confirmation_bias.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/confirmation_bias.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/appendixe/appendixe.html" rel="nofollow">http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/appendixe/appendixe.html</a><br />
<a href="http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html#SECTION02121000000000000000" rel="nofollow">http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html#SECTION02121000000000000000</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil F.</title>
		<link>http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2009/03/protectionism-in-the-name-of-global-warming-regulations/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=283#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>Rob N. Hood: You are a broken record. You keep saying the same things, but you ignore the reality of what is actually happenning right now. And what is happenning now is not what the predictions you rely on say was going to happen. If the Arctic is on track to be ice free by the summer of 2013, would it not stand to reason that each successive year between the time that prediction was made and 2013, that the ice would be less and less? If it were I might think that there is a possibility that you might be right. But that is not supported by the facts.
You seem to be afflicted with what is called a confirmation bias. You only see what you want to see and ignore the rest. I don't know why you continue to post here because you are not going to convince me, or anyone else here, that you are right. Especially with those tired worn out arguments that you use. You may as well be arguing that the Sun is purple and the Moon is just our imagination.
At any rate, I am no longer going to respond to you Rob. You are a complete waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob N. Hood: You are a broken record. You keep saying the same things, but you ignore the reality of what is actually happenning right now. And what is happenning now is not what the predictions you rely on say was going to happen. If the Arctic is on track to be ice free by the summer of 2013, would it not stand to reason that each successive year between the time that prediction was made and 2013, that the ice would be less and less? If it were I might think that there is a possibility that you might be right. But that is not supported by the facts.<br />
You seem to be afflicted with what is called a confirmation bias. You only see what you want to see and ignore the rest. I don&#8217;t know why you continue to post here because you are not going to convince me, or anyone else here, that you are right. Especially with those tired worn out arguments that you use. You may as well be arguing that the Sun is purple and the Moon is just our imagination.<br />
At any rate, I am no longer going to respond to you Rob. You are a complete waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
