Comments on: New Report for Policymakers: Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/ Exposing the truth about global warming hysteria Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:25:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Rob N. http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1459 Rob N. Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:46:13 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1459 You could be right, but what if you're not? A focus on things that are more obviously scams should be just as interesting to you, and maddening, such as the following and has a more immediate effect on the average person's taxes and spending money than climate change. For example: There are three things that are driving up the price of oil: the falling dollar, speculation and buying on margin. The dollar is tanking because of the Federal Reserve's low interest monetary policies have kept interest rates below the rate of inflation for most of the last decade. Add that to the $700 billion current account deficit and a National Debt that has increased from $5.8 trillion when Bush first took office to over $9 trillion today and it's a wonder the dollar hasn't gone “Poof” already. According to a January 4 editorial in the Wall Street Journal: “If the dollar had remained 'as good as gold' since 2001, oil today would be selling at about $30 per barrel, not $99. (today $126 per barrel) The decline of the dollar against gold and oil suggests a US monetary that is supplying too many dollars.” Wall Street Journal 1-4-08 The price of oil has more than quadrupled since 2001, from roughly $30 per barrel to $126, WITHOUT ANY DISRUPTIONS TO SUPPLY. There's no shortage; it's just another scam basically. If you want to get angry and paranoid about something, how about the more tangible issues?? You could be right, but what if you’re not? A focus on things that are more obviously scams should be just as interesting to you, and maddening, such as the following and has a more immediate effect on the average person’s taxes and spending money than climate change. For example:

There are three things that are driving up the price of oil: the falling dollar, speculation and buying on margin.

The dollar is tanking because of the Federal Reserve’s low interest monetary policies have kept interest rates below the rate of inflation for most of the last decade. Add that to the $700 billion current account deficit and a National Debt that has increased from $5.8 trillion when Bush first took office to over $9 trillion today and it’s a wonder the dollar hasn’t gone “Poof” already.

According to a January 4 editorial in the Wall Street Journal: “If the dollar had remained ‘as good as gold’ since 2001, oil today would be selling at about $30 per barrel, not $99. (today $126 per barrel) The decline of the dollar against gold and oil suggests a US monetary that is supplying too many dollars.” Wall Street Journal 1-4-08

The price of oil has more than quadrupled since 2001, from roughly $30 per barrel to $126, WITHOUT ANY DISRUPTIONS TO SUPPLY. There’s no shortage; it’s just another scam basically. If you want to get angry and paranoid about something, how about the more tangible issues??

]]> By: jack goldman http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1458 jack goldman Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:48:25 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1458 Governments seek totalitarian control to "protect us" from climate change and terrorists, for our own good. We pay for nothing to happen. What a scam. What made the ice age glaciers a mile thick melt from Minnesota in the past million years? It's all about taxes. Governments seek totalitarian control to “protect us” from climate change and terrorists, for our own good. We pay for nothing to happen. What a scam. What made the ice age glaciers a mile thick melt from Minnesota in the past million years? It’s all about taxes.

]]> By: jack goldman http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1457 jack goldman Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:47:04 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1457 Climate change was going to be the foundation of globalism until terrorism came along. It's all about globalism, not climate change. My only question? There was a mile of ice above Minnesota four times. It melted four times without any humans on the planet. What made the climate change, cool, and warm back then? The sun, and our rotation through the galaxy, drives the weather changes and climate changes. Governments seek totalitarian control to "protect us" from climate change and terrorists, for our own good. We pay for nothing to happen. What a scam. What made the ice age glaciers a mile thick melt from Minnesota in the past million years? It's all about taxes. Climate change was going to be the foundation of globalism until terrorism came along. It’s all about globalism, not climate change. My only question? There was a mile of ice above Minnesota four times. It melted four times without any humans on the planet. What made the climate change, cool, and warm back then? The sun, and our rotation through the galaxy, drives the weather changes and climate changes. Governments seek totalitarian control to “protect us” from climate change and terrorists, for our own good. We pay for nothing to happen. What a scam. What made the ice age glaciers a mile thick melt from Minnesota in the past million years? It’s all about taxes.

]]> By: Drew Emmer http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1456 Drew Emmer Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:49:15 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1456 I think the geophysicist's opinion matters in this debate, to wit: Geophysics From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Geophysics, a branch of Earth sciences, is the study of the Earth by quantitative physical methods, especially by seismic, electromagnetic, and radioactivity methods. The theories and techniques of geophysics are employed extensively in the planetary sciences in general. The field of geophysics includes the branches of: Seismology (earthquakes and elastic waves) Gravity and geodesy (the Earth's gravitational field and the size and form of the Earth) Atmospheric science, which includes: Atmospheric electricity and terrestrial magnetism (including ionosphere, Van Allen belts, telluric currents, Radiant energy, etc.) Meteorology and Climatology, which both involve studies of the weather. Aeronomy, the study of the physical structure and chemistry of the atmosphere. Geomagnetism (study of the Earth's magnetic field) Geothermometry (heating of the Earth, heat flow, volcanology, and hot springs) Hydrology (ground and surface water, sometimes including glaciology) Physical oceanography Tectonophysics (geological processes in the Earth) Geodynamics (numerical study of the inner Earth) Exploration and engineering geophysics (see also Archaeological geophysics) Geophysical Engineering Glaciology Petrophysics Applied geophysics Mineral Physics Engineering geology I think the geophysicist’s opinion matters in this debate, to wit:

Geophysics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Geophysics, a branch of Earth sciences, is the study of the Earth by quantitative physical methods, especially by seismic, electromagnetic, and radioactivity methods. The theories and techniques of geophysics are employed extensively in the planetary sciences in general.

The field of geophysics includes the branches of:

Seismology (earthquakes and elastic waves)
Gravity and geodesy (the Earth’s gravitational field and the size and form of the Earth)
Atmospheric science, which includes:
Atmospheric electricity and terrestrial magnetism (including ionosphere, Van Allen belts, telluric currents, Radiant energy, etc.)
Meteorology and Climatology, which both involve studies of the weather.
Aeronomy, the study of the physical structure and chemistry of the atmosphere.
Geomagnetism (study of the Earth’s magnetic field)
Geothermometry (heating of the Earth, heat flow, volcanology, and hot springs)
Hydrology (ground and surface water, sometimes including glaciology)
Physical oceanography
Tectonophysics (geological processes in the Earth)
Geodynamics (numerical study of the inner Earth)
Exploration and engineering geophysics (see also Archaeological geophysics)
Geophysical Engineering
Glaciology
Petrophysics
Applied geophysics
Mineral Physics
Engineering geology

]]> By: Dan McGrath http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1455 Dan McGrath Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:25:07 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1455 "Dr. Syun Akasofu, is a Geophysicist not a climatologist so his doubts regarding the cause of global warming should not be used in your website." That's an odd notion. Care to explain your thinking on that? “Dr. Syun Akasofu, is a Geophysicist not a climatologist so his doubts regarding the cause of global warming should not be used in your website.”

That’s an odd notion. Care to explain your thinking on that?

]]> By: mark http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1454 mark Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:51:53 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1454 Dr. Syun Akasofu, is a Geophysicist not a climatologist so his doubts regarding the cause of global warming should not be used in your website. Dr. Syun Akasofu, is a Geophysicist not a climatologist so his doubts regarding the cause of global warming should not be used in your website.

]]> By: boyd george http://www.globalclimatescam.com/2008/03/new-report-for-policymakers-nature-not-human-activity-rules-the-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1453 boyd george Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:13:57 +0000 http://www.globalclimatescam.com/?p=66#comment-1453 While I agree 110%, you're going after their religion and facts mean zilch to the people you're trying to reach. IF, as in BIG IF, you could get the media to develop what we used to call honesty, or at the very least, objectivity, then your message would prevail. However, the media is neither honest nor objective and that will not change anytime soon, regretably. While I agree 110%, you’re going after their religion and facts mean zilch to the people you’re trying to reach. IF, as in BIG IF, you could get the media to develop what we used to call honesty, or at the very least, objectivity, then your message would prevail. However, the media is neither honest nor objective and that will not change anytime soon, regretably.

]]>